Share This Article with a Friend!

Why Do We Continue To Let These Vipers Into America?

President Trump keeps getting it right about immigration and terrorism, even as out of control anti-constitutional federal judges keep trying to stymie his efforts to implement the America First immigration agenda that helped him win the 2016 presidential election.

New York terrorist attackThe latest example of “Trump is right” news is yesterday’s terrorist attack in New York.

The Muslim terrorist, Bangladeshi national Akayed Ullah, was admitted to the United States on a chain-migration visa – the same kind of senseless free pass into America that millions of other immigrants from Muslim terrorist hotspots have used to enter this country since 9/11.

Ullah came to the U.S. through the F43 visa, allowing him to obtain a Green Card simply because his father’s brother or sister had recently been naturalized as a U.S. citizen. This process is known as “extended-family chain migration,” explained our friend John Binder of Breitbart.

NBC News reports Ullah said he attempted the attack in the name of ISIS, and told investigators that he was angry over Muslims being killed around the world, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News.

In addition, he said he watched ISIS propaganda online and read other extremist writings like propaganda magazine "Inspire" and learned how to make the explosive online, according to the official.

Ullah told investigators he planned the attack himself and was motivated by U.S. bombings in ISIS-controlled territory, multiple senior law enforcement officials told NBC News. He was not on law enforcement’s radar prior to this.

Yesterday’s incident came a mere six weeks after an Uzbek Muslim, admitted via the visa lottery deliberately drove down a bike path in lower Manhattan, killing eight people in the deadliest terror attack in New York City since Sept. 11, 2001.

Ullah is the fourth Bangladeshi national in the United States to be accused of terrorism in a little more than a decade reported Breitbart’s John Binder.

All of this begs the question, “Why do continue policies that let these vipers into our country?”

In our columns in CHQ we have warned our fellow Americans about the threat Islam poses to constitutional liberty, due to its political goal of imposing an anti-constitutional system of government (Sharia) through political subversion and terrorism: “We Can – And Should – Ban Most Muslim Immigration To America,” “Still No Religious Test For Immigration Mr. Speaker?” “It Only Takes One: Why We Must Stop Importing Jihad Through Muslim Immigration.” “Homegrown Muslim Terrorism Fueled By Obama – Bush Immigration System,” “America's Suicidal Muslim Immigration Policies,” “Importing Jihad,” “Why Do We Let These Vipers Into America?,” and “Paul Ryan’s Hijra” are just a few of the articles that have pointed out the dangers of mass migration from Muslim countries.

Hijra, or jihad by emigration, is a fundamental tenet of Islam harkening back to the earliest days of Mohammed’s war to establish hegemony over the cities of southwest Arabia. The first Hijra was the flight of Mohammed from Mecca to the largely Jewish city of Yathrib, now the completely Muslim city of Medina.

While the story of how Yathrib came to be Medina is too long to recount here, suffice it to say that by fleeing the city of Mecca, where they appeared to be in danger of being eliminated, and appearing at Yathrib as refugees, Mohammed and his small band of adherents were able to reform the Arab Muslim clans, gain new adherents and replace the population and leadership of Yathrib with the Muslims who became the army necessary to reclaim Mecca and eventually spread Islam throughout the world.

In a rational world the dangerous policy of allowing mass migration from Muslim countries that is intended to fundamentally transform America by importing jihad into our country would be stopped cold by a Republican majority in Congress.

But this is not a rational world, this is a world run by the personal whim of arrogant Washington insiders, chief among them being Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

Ryan has made increasing Muslim immigration to America his special project and has steadfastly fought any attempts by conservatives to slow or stop what a large majority of American believe is an existential threat to constitutional liberty.

As Breitbart News reported, more than 140,000 Bangladeshi nationals — larger than the population of Dayton, Ohio — have entered the United States since 2005 for no other reason than to reunite with extended family members.

In October, President Donald Trump called for an end to this “chain migration” process in his immigration principles, and a good way to begin to implement those principles would be for Congress to pass the RAISE Act, introduced by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AK) and David Perdue (R-GA).

Specifically, the RAISE Act would:

Establish a Skills-Based Points System. The RAISE Act would replace the current permanent employment-visa system with a skills-based points system, akin to the systems used by Canada and Australia. The system would prioritize those immigrants who are best positioned to succeed in the United States and expand the economy. Applicants earn points based on education, English-language ability, high-paying job offers, age, record of extraordinary achievement, and entrepreneurial initiative.

Prioritize Immediate Family Households. The RAISE Act would retain immigration preferences for the spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents while eliminating preferences for certain categories of extended and adult family members.

Eliminate the Outdated Diversity Visa Lottery. The Diversity Lottery is plagued with fraud, advances no economic or humanitarian interest, and does not even promote diversity. The RAISE Act would eliminate the 50,000 visas arbitrarily allocated to this lottery.

Place a Responsible Limit on Permanent Residency for Refugees. The RAISE Act would limit refugees offered permanent residency to 50,000 per year, in line with a 13-year average.

We are in a war of ideas, not just with radical Islamists, but with concepts deeply embedded in Muslim culture. And if mass legal (and illegal) immigration from Muslim countries continues unabated we are going to lose that war.

We urge all CHQ readers to contact their Representative and Senators. Tell them the latest terrorist attack in New York demonstrates the urgency of the need to rein-in immigration by Muslims hostile to constitutional liberty and the values of the Western Enlightenment enshrined in our Constitution. The toll-free number is 1-866-220-0044 call today.

George Rasley is editor of Richard Viguerie's A veteran of over 300 political campaigns, he served on the staff of Vice President Dan Quayle, as Director of Policy and Communication for Congressman Adam Putnam (FL-12) then Vice Chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee's Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, and as spokesman for Rep. Mac Thornberry now-Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

Share this

Immigration and the illegal alien invasion

First we need to begin to refute the notion that all people who enter our country are immigrants. Those who enter our country without permission are not immigrants they are illegal alien invaders. An immigrant is one who knocks on our door and asks permission to enter.
We will continue to lose the debate on immigration if we do not have those who can better articulate the problems that unfettered immigration poses to our sovereign nation and our citizens.
When we hear a black man defending immigration especially the illegal alien invaders and claim that to reject immigration is a racist act they need to be pinned down and demand to know why is it that this person believes that they should represent immigrants and illegal alien invaders over American citizens especially those American citizens in the minority community.
It is often claimed that immigrants even the illegal alien invaders add to our economy, we need to counter that with a statement of fact that our own American citizens can add the same benefit to our economy. For every American citizen that fills a job that the immigrant or illegal alien invader now fills the same benefit will be realized perhaps even more if it means that if the American citizen is collecting welfare benefits it would help to remove the burden to the system or at least reduce the payments received by those on the welfare plantation.
As long as the business community values immigrants more that American citizens then we will continue to have problems with immigration.