Share This Article with a Friend!


The judge versus the vigilante

Daniel Oliver, Washington Times

Christine Blasey Ford’s “high” motives justify her conduct. She has damaged her victim, Judge Kavanaugh, by, inter alia, telling her story to The Washington Post, and he is entitled to redress. Normally, a public figure who sues for libel or slander must show actual malice. But accusing someone of a crime 36 years after it allegedly happened without a shred of corroborating evidence, and not even verified by people the victim named as witnesses, should be deemed constructive malice. Vigilante justice is not justice.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/1/there-is-no-justice-for-judge-kavanaugh-without-th/