Share This Article with a Friend!


Judicial Watch Files Ethics Complaint Against Anti-American Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar

Tom Fitton Ilhan Omar
We got a heads-up via Twitter that our friends at Judicial Watch have filed a formal ethics complaint against anti-American Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN-5).

Judicial Watch announced Tuesday that it filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Ilhan Omar over allegations that she married her brother and actively facilitated an immigration fraud scheme. The notice was hand delivered to U.S. House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics David Skaggs calling for a full investigation into Omar’s scheme.

“The evidence is overwhelming Rep. Omar may have violated the law and House rules. The House of Representatives must urgently investigate and resolve the serious allegations of wrongdoing by Rep. Omar,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We encourage Americans to share their views on Rep. Omar’s apparent misconduct with their congressmen.”

Jennie Taer, reporting for SaraACarter.com, says the letter to the chairman highlights that there is “substantial” evidence that “Rep. Ilhan Omar may have committed the following crimes in violation of both federal law and Minnesota state law: perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.”

Investigative reporters David Steinberg, Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson verified Omar engaged in immigration fraud by marrying her biological brother and later divorcing him claiming she no longer had contact with him, according to Judicial Watch.

Steinberg, Samsundar and Johnson have produced credible evidence that Ilhan Omar and her family changed their name to illegally enter the United States back in 1995.

And, says Steinberg, she obviously has no problem with lying on federal documents and appear to give probable cause to investigate Omar for eight instances of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, up to eight years of state and federal tax fraud, two years of federal student loan fraud, and even bigamy.

Here is the list of evidence of possible crimes committed by Ilhan Omar culled from The Gateway Pundit and Powerline:

Verifiable UK and U.S. marriage records

Verifiable address records

Time-stamped, traceable, archived online communications (Convictions and settlements based upon social media evidence are commonplace, Anthony Weiner being a notable example)

Background check confirmations of SSNs and birthdates

Archived court documents signed under penalty of perjury

Photos which can be examined to rule out digital manipulation

The 2019 Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board investigation, which found Omar filed illegal joint tax returns with a man who was not her husband in at least 2014 and 2015

Three years’ of evidence published across many articles — none of which has been shown to be incorrect, or have even been challenged with contradictory evidence from Rep. Omar or any other source

Perjury evidence that stands on its own — regardless of whom she married:

Long after June 2011, she was clearly in contact with the only man in either the U.S. or the UK with the same name and birthdate as the man she married. She was clearly in contact with several people who were in contact with him.

Further, Preya Samsundar did contact him, published how she managed to contact him, and published his email admitting to being photographed with Omar in London in 2015. To be clear: Omar was legally married to an “Ahmed Nur Said Elmi” at the time she was photographed next to a man who admits his name is Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, and that he is in the photo.

Samsundar published all of this information on how to contact Ahmed Nur Said Elmi a few months before Omar swore to that nine-question court document.

Rep. Omar has refused all inquiries from her constituents, elected officials, and media outlets to provide any specific evidence contradicting even a single allegation suggested by three years of now-public information.

In fact, Omar has responded by making information less available:

In August 2016, after Scott Johnson and Preya Samsundar posted the allegations, Omar’s verified social media accounts were taken offline.

Ahmed Nur Said Elmi’s social media accounts were also taken offline.

When the accounts returned, a large amount of potentially incriminating evidence had verifiably been deleted.

Steinberg and his team found and published at least ten additional “before and after” instances of evidence still being deleted in 2018.

_____________

The information developed by David Steinberg, Preya Samsundar and Scott Johnson provides the basis, not just of a House Ethics Committee complaint, but for an FBI investigation into the ongoing criminal activity by which Ilhan Omar and others covered up her crimes and facilitated her election to the United States Congress.

These facts describe perhaps the most extensive spree of illegal conduct committed by a House member in American history. There cannot be two standards of justice in the United States. We urge Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray to give this matter exactly the same attention they would give any other criminal credibly accused of these crimes.

Share this