Richard Viguerie: No consideration of bailout until AFTER full investigation
Written by Richard Viguerie on September 24, 2008, 12:53 AM
 
Special counsel or independent commission should question all involved, “examine every scrap of paper” to place responsibility for the financial crisis

      Congress must refuse to take up bailout legislation until a thorough investigation determines who is responsible for the financial crisis, Richard A. Viguerie, the Chairman of ConservativeHQ.com, said. 

     “The Washington establishment wants to move quickly, to railroad something through before we can determine who is to blame,” he said.  “It’s a clever way to avoid responsibility.  We can’t let them get away with it.”

     Viguerie said that, before any bailout is considered, there must be a full investigation by a special counsel or an independent commission, questioning everyone involved and examining “every e-mail, every phone record, every scrap of paper that might explain the relationship between corrupt corporations like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and their political friends.”

     Of particular note, Viguerie said, are “records that indicate where Fannie and Freddie’s money went, and why.  Why were politicians like Chris Dodd and Barack Obama made the prime recipients of Fannie Mae money?  What role did members of Congress play in funneling Fannie and Freddie money to charities and community organizers?  What did Barney Frank and others do to pressure lenders to give money to people who couldn’t pay them back?  How did so-called ‘Partnership Offices’ and ‘Community Business Centers’ work with politicians to beat back efforts to control Fannie and Freddie’s corrupting influence? 

     “Who did what to obstruct audits and investigations and reform legislation?

     “We need a minute-by-minute timeline showing exactly how Fannie and Freddie spent at least $170 million on lobbying in the past decade.  We need to track every political contribution, and find out what the quid-pro-quo was.  Plus, we need an accounting of every penny spent on ‘charities’ and interest groups in order to form alliances with well-connected people.”

     Special attention, he said, should be given to the top 50 politicians who received contributions or pork from Fannie and Freddie, to the top 50 Fannie and Freddie executives with political backgrounds, and to anyone – lobbyist, executive, or whatever – who received $1 million or more from those groups in the past 15 years.

     If a 911 Commission-type group is appointed to oversee this investigation, Viguerie said, “it must be made up of people with absolutely no conflict of interest. 

     “That means people without lobbying connections, people who have no friendships or professional relationships at stake, people who understand how political corruption works but are untouched and untouchable.  That means people from outside Washington, and from outside the Washington establishment and the world of high finance, and untangled in this scandal’s web,” he said.

Blog Comments

Nicolas Martin
Richard Viguerie is a sell-out. He's willing to accept nationalization so long as a sham investigation is conducted first. Of course the bias of any government investigation is that government is not the culprit, and the nature of the scapegoat will depend on which party controls the investigation. Mr. Viguerie always comes crawling back to the Republicans, though they are now the party that has given us what George Will calls "the most leftist administration in American history." The Chinese communists extoll the virtues of capitalism, while the American Republicans sing the praises of socialism. Nixon would smile cynically.
GARY HILL
INVESTAGATE SO THAT CRIMINAL CHARGES CAN BE BROUGHT AGAINST THOSE WHO COOKED THE BOOKS, TOOK THE MONEY AND RAN. BUT NO BAILOUT!!!!
Timothy Birdnow
Mr. Viguerie is right; this was a scandal of titanic proportions, and I suspect a number of people in Congress should go to jail over this. The sham ``bailout`` is really a cover-up, by the Bush Administration as much as the Democrats. Granted, Bush tried to reform Fannie and Freddie, but he was right on board with the ``affordable housing`` movement, and his own Justice Department and others coerced lenders to make sub-prime loans. I remember reading the whole crazy idea back in `02 or `03; since landlords didn`t want to participate in Section 8 housing (and they don`t because of the draconian requirements the government puts on them, requiring that they make all sorts of improvements on the property, then not paying if one of their own inspectors misses an inspection or files paperwork improperly, as well as low-balling the rent) so they were going to push for loans so Section 8 people could BUY houses rather than rent. These are people who cannot rent on the open market because they have no income or terrible credit, and the government was going to demand they receive homeloans! It`s much more expensive-and demands far more responsibility-to own property than to rent it. Real smart, that! But Congress saw a way to buy votes and funnel money to Chris Cox and Barack Obama, so they took it. This has been as dirty of an issue as I`ve seen; some accountability is necessary, or the bailout will accomplish nothing. It likely will accomplish nothing anyway, except Socialize the Mortgage industry.
Larry Picchiotti
Mr. Martin sums it up perfectly. The current Republican party is just as bad as the Democrats. Conservatives need to vote third party (Libertarian or Constitution) to get real change.
Matt Kratoville
Gee, folks, what now? Socialized Mortgages????? What a country!!!

New Comment




simple_captcha.jpg
(type the code from the image)