Share This Article with a Friend!

How Does Hillary Clinton’s Head Not Explode?

When one considers the vast web of lies and deceit, the deaths and ruined lives for which she is responsible and the destruction that she has wrought across the globe is it possible that Hillary Clinton’s illness is simply a protracted and intense case of guilt? 

Consider that in Syria alone as many as 470,000 have lost their lives thanks to the actions of Hillary Clinton; in Libya up to 50,000, not including four Americans – Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Hillary ClintonSmith, and CIA operatives Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both former Navy SEALs. 

And this body count does not include the hundreds of thousands maimed and disabled, the millions displaced and the post-apocalyptic destruction of some of the larger cities in the Middle East and North Africa. 

Neither does the body count fully explain the ongoing lies and deceit about how and why the United States found itself on the same side as the vicious Islamists of ISIS and local militia warlords who have engaged in mass abduction and detention, beating and routine torture, killings and atrocities by the thousands – including the grisly killing of the Libyan despot Muammar Gaddafi after his captors had sodomised him with a knife. 

Then again, the idea of Hillary Clinton having a soul capable of guilt was belied by the fact that she actually joked about Gaddafi’s grisly death on TV* and continues to lie to this day about what prompted the attacks on the Benghazi consulate and CIA compound. 

In the case of her email scandal alone the lies have become so dizzying that she has all but given up trying to defend them or even keep them straight. 

During a House Select Committee on Benghazi hearing on October 22, 2015, Secretary Clinton testified with respect to (1) whether she sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time; (2) whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system; (3) whether there was one, or more servers that stored work-related emails during her time as Secretary of State; and (4) whether she provided all her work-related emails to the Department of State.  

Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comey described in his public statement on July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016. 

(1)  Contrary to her sworn testimony, Secretary Clinton sent and received emails that were marked classified at the time.       

With respect to whether she sent or received emails that were marked classified at the time, Secretary Clinton testified under oath to the Select Committee that she did not.  Specifically, during questioning by Rep. Jim Jordan, Secretary Clinton stated “there was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received.” Secretary Clinton further testified:

[M]any Americans have no idea how the classification process works.  And therefore I wanted to make it clear that there is a system within our government, certainly within the State Department . . . where material that is thought to be classified is marked such, so that people have the opportunity to know how they are supposed to be handling those materials . . . and that’s why it became clearer, I believe, to say that nothing was marked classified at the time I sent or received it. 

The FBI, however, found several of Secretary Clinton’s emails did in fact contain markings that identified classified information therein.  In Director Comey’s public statement on July 5, 2016, he said, “a very small number of the emails containing classified information bore the markings indicating the presence of classified information.” 

When Director Comey testified on July 7, 2016, he specifically addressed this issue.  Rep. Trey Gowdy asked, “Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified either sent or received.  Was it true?”  He said it was not.  

Director Comey also stated, “There was classified material emailed.” Specifically, he stated that three documents on Secretary Clinton’s private server contained classified information clearly marked “Confidential.”  He further testified, “In the one involving ‘top secret’ information, Secretary Clinton not only received but also sent emails that talked about the same subject.” 

(2)  Contrary to her sworn testimony, Secretary Clinton’s lawyers did not read each email in her personal account to identify all the work-related messages. 

With respect to whether her attorneys reviewed each of the emails on her personal email system, Secretary Clinton testified that her attorneys used search terms and reviewed every single email to identify any that were work-related and should therefore be returned to the Department of State. She stated:

Rep. Jordan:    But I'm asking how -- I'm asking how it was done. Was -- did someone physically look at the 62,000 e-mails, or did you use search terms, date parameters? I want to know the specifics. 

Mrs. Clinton:   They did all of that, and I did not look over their shoulders, because I thought it would be appropriate for them to conduct that search, and they did. 

Rep. Jordan:    Will you provide this committee -- or can you answer today, what were the search terms? 

Mrs. Clinton:   The search terms were everything you could imagine that might be related to anything, but they also went through every single e-mail. 

The FBI found, however, that Secretary Clinton’s lawyers did not in fact read all of her emails—they relied exclusively on a set of search terms to identify work-related messages.  On July 5, 2016, Director Comey testified:

The lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her e-mails, as we did for those available to us; instead, they relied on header information and used search terms to try to find all work-related e-mails among the reportedly more than 60,000 total e-mails remaining on Secretary Clinton’s personal system in 2014. It is highly likely their search terms missed some work-related e-mails, and that we later found them, for example, in the mailboxes of other officials or in the slack space of a server.  It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery. 

(3)  Contrary to her sworn testimony, Secretary Clinton used several different servers and numerous devices to send and receive work-related emails. 

With respect to whether there was one, or more servers that stored work-related emails during her time as Secretary of State, Secretary Clinton testified there was only one server.  She stated:

Rep. Jordan:    In March, you also said this: your server was physically located on your property, which is protected by the Secret Service. I'm having a hard time figuring this out, because this story's been all over the place.  But -- there was one server on your property in New York, and a second server hosted by a Colorado company in -- housed in New Jersey. Is that right? There were two servers? 

Mrs. Clinton:   No. 

Rep. Jordan:    OK. 

Mrs. Clinton:   There was a -- there was a server... 

Rep. Jordan:    Just one? 

Mrs. Clinton: . . . that was already being used by my husband's team. An existing system in our home that I used, and then later, again, my husband's office decided that they wanted to change their arrangements, and that's when they contracted with the company in Colorado. 

Rep. Jordan:    And so there's only one server? Is that what you're telling me? And it's the one server that the FBI has? 

Mrs. Clinton: The FBI has the server that was used during the tenure of my State Department service. 

The FBI, however, found Secretary Clinton stored work-related emails on several servers.  In Director Comey’s public statement, he said, “Secretary Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department, and used numerous mobile devices to view and send e-mail on that personal domain.” 

In Director Comey’s testimony on July 7, 2016, he stated that Secretary Clinton used several devices to send and receive work-related emails during her tenure as Secretary of State.  He testified, “She used multiple devices during her four years as secretary of state.” 

(4)  Contrary to her sworn testimony, Secretary Clinton did not provide all of her work-related email to the Department of Justice. 

Finally, with respect to whether she provided all her work-related emails to the Department of State, Secretary Clinton testified to the Select Committee that she had.  She stated:

Mrs. Clinton: Well, Congressman, I have said repeatedly that I take responsibility for my use of personal e-mail. I've said it was a mistake. I've said that it was allowed, but it was not a good choice.  When I got to the department, we were faced with a global financial crisis, major troop decisions on Afghanistan, the imperative to rebuild our alliances in Europe and Asia, an ongoing war in Iraq, and so much else.  E-mail was not my primary means of communication, as I have said earlier. I did not have a computer on my desk. I've described how I did work: in meetings, secure and unsecured phone calls, reviewing many, many pages of materials every day, attending . . . 

Rep. Jordan:    I -- I -- I appreciate (inaudible). 

Mrs. Clinton: . . . a great deal of meetings, and I provided the department, which has been providing you, with all of my work-related e-mails, all that I had. Approximately 55,000 pages. And they are being publicly released. 

The FBI found, however, “several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.”  In the course of its investigation, the FBI recovered “still others . . . from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.” 

When Director Comey appeared before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016, he confirmed that Secretary Clinton did not turn over all work-related emails to the FBI.  He stated, “We found work-related emails, thousands, that were not returned.”     

And then there’s the Clinton Foundation. 

The latest batch of previously hidden emails uncovered by Judicial Watch shows then-Secretary of State Clinton arranging favors for Clinton Foundation donors. “These new emails confirm that Hillary Clinton abused her office by selling favors to Clinton Foundation donors,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. 

That is a major understatement. 

More than half the private citizens who got face time or spoke with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state forked over bundles of cash to the Clinton Foundation, a stunning new investigation revealed Tuesday. 

At least 85 of the 154 nongovernment fat cats who got access to Clinton donated to her family charity or promised to back its programs, either personally or through businesses or other groups, according to a review of State Department documents by The Associated Press. 

Combined, the donors shelled out as much as $156 million, with at least 40 donating more than $100,000 each and 20 shelling out more than $1 million — more evidence that the family’s foundation doubled as a pay-for-play operation for those seeking access to Clinton, concluded The New York Post. 

In another disclosure, Fox News reported that a senior executive at the foundation left almost 150 telephone messages over two years for Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s top aide at the State Department. 

A review of Mills’ call logs shows at least 148 messages from Laura Graham, who was the Clinton Foundation’s chief operating officer, between 2010 and 2012. 

The New York Post reports “No other individual or nonprofit appears in the logs with anything approaching that frequency or volume, according to the review of the documents, which were released to the conservative advocacy group Citizens United as part of a long-running lawsuit over a Freedom of Information Act request.” 

Amid all the speculation about Hillary Clinton having Parkinson’s Disease, a subdural hematoma or other neurological condition there’s another explanation for Hillary Clinton’s health issues; guilt. 

In an article for The American Thinker “Hillary’s Email Testimony, Powell’s Facts and Mens Rea” our colleague Mark J. Fitzgibbons explained the legal concept of mens rea, otherwise known as the guilty mind. However, the kind of guilt that we see affecting Hillary Clinton’s health is not the legal kind – mens rea – rather it is the soul-searing guilt that psychiatrists have found actually affects one’s health. 

The level of guilt you feel about your lies is a crucial factor in how much they'll affect your body. "The more guilt or anxiety you feel," UCLA researchers found, "the more physical and mental symptoms you’re going to experience." "For some, it’s an immediate effect," the researchers found. "For others it’s a slow build of physical problems, like headaches." "The more guilt or anxiety you feel," the researchers found, "the more physical and mental symptoms you’re going to experience." 

What’s the cure for the physical manifestations of lying? Just one thing: the truth.  


Share this


For dishonesty to make one ill, one must have a conscience. I don't think Hillary has a conscience. Thus, if she is ill, it's not because of her lies. That's just my opinion.

First of all, Ms. Clinton

First of all, Ms. Clinton does not have a conscience. She is a Narcissistic Sociopath portraying the atypical delusions of grandeur. She cannot empathize with ane other person or persons, but can simulate compassion when it positively benefits her. To put it simply she has no soul. She is the personification of Evil.

Guilt is Debilitating

Some people reading this article might think it's a load of hooey, but I witnessed this very thing in my own mother. She felt guilty about someone's death that happened in her youth, and she carried the guilt and let it eat at her her whole life. She had cancer more than once, a stroke, ulcers, would break out in hives, and was extremely paranoid. I also think it brought her a touch of schizophrenia. Needless to say, she was a mess, and I think it finally polished her off.