Share This Article with a Friend!

John McCain is Shocked, Shocked to Discover Russian Meddling in U.S. Elections

For someone who has served in war, Sen. John McCain is easily shocked. He has joined the wailing and gnashing of teeth filling Washington over Russia’s alleged hacking of the Democrats. He and his war-happy colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham are pressing for an investigation by a newly constituted select congressional committee. 

McCain naturally blamed President Barack Obama. In this case, worries McCain, if the Russians are “able to harm the electoral process, they may destroy democracy.” Indeed, he continued, “This is the sign of a possible John McCainunraveling of the world order that was established after World War II, which has made one of the most peaceful periods in the history of the world.” 

For all of the sturm und drang generated by the alleged Russian hack, it appears to have been rather modest even if true. Some doubts remain that the Russians even were responsible. Nor was there any attack on the American electoral system. No voting machines were broken into. No votes were changed. 

Donald Trump won because a majority of Americans in critical states preferred him to his badly compromised opponent, whose failings have been on display publicly for a quarter century. Neither Moscow nor anyone else changed the outcome. 

Moreover, there is evidence that an attempt was made to hack Republican accounts as well. In any case, the cyber-raid was of a private party, in which no national secrets were compromised or business technologies stolen. Rather, the information obtained should have been public since it highlighted the sleaze surrounding the Clintons. The release actually benefited the American public. 

The principle lesson of the Democratic hack, as well as previous attacks on Sony Pictures and other private entities, is that cyber-security is everyone’s responsibility. There are more than a few malign actors on the loose who will take advantage of any opportunity to steal information for fun or profit. However, “the world order” is likely to survive. 

Ironically, Democrats were not always so squeamish about reliance on Moscow for political support. In 1983 California Sen. John Tunney, an intimate of Sen. Ted Kennedy, passed a message to KGB head Viktor Chebrikov, who summarized the matter in a memo to Communist Party General Secretary Yuri Andropov, which was discovered after the Soviet Union’s collapse. In sum, Kennedy hoped to bring Soviet political and military figures onto American television to explain how they were misunderstood peaceniks resisting crazy Ronald Reagan’s war-like policies. 

Sen. McCain, too, apparently is unaware of his manifold hypocrisies and inconsistencies. He, along with the Neoconservative cabal, never has been shy about insisting on Washington’s right to intervene in other nations’ political systems. 

Covert involvement goes back through the Cold War. Multiple aid programs for “democracy” have been created to back parties and factions seen as more pro-American. U.S. officials insisted on the Palestinian elections which brought Hamas to power. It is Neoconservative gospel that President Obama could and should have prevented Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s re-election in 2009. Numerous Americans, including McCain, backed a street revolution against the elected, Russia-friendly government in Ukraine. “The world order” may have hung in the balance for a time, but ultimately survived. 

In 2014 McCain demanded regime change in Libya. Less than two years before he and Graham had been supping with Moammar Khadafy in Tripoli discussing providing the latter with aid to combat al-Qaeda. 

Sen. McCain never seemed to find a war he didn’t want to fight—Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, North Korea, Georgia, Ukraine. In criticizing Russia’s war with Georgia, which the latter started, he declared in 2008: “in the 21st century nations don’t invade other nations.” 

Inconsiderate observers pointed out that the U.S., with McCain’s enthusiastic support, had invaded Iraq only five years before. Moreover, what Moscow did in Georgia looked a lot like what America did (admittedly in the 20th, not 21st, century) in Serbia: intervene in an existing separatist conflict, forcibly dismember an independent state, and create a new country. Without the sanction of international law. 

Few political leaders in Washington have been as reckless and clueless as John McCain. Personal heroism obviously does not translate into good judgment. 

If Russia was behind the Clinton hack, Americans owe Vladimir Putin a round of applause. The information released confirmed what some of us already believed about the Clintons and their followers. This purported cyber-attack affected the 2016 presidential election by giving Americans better information to use in deciding who to vote for.

Share this


Is the situation not ironic? Dems accuse Trump camp for using foreign entities to hack the Dems and therefore kill H's chance of winning. Yet this information arises: Dems (and unhappy Repubs) hire a foreign operative to dig up dirt on Trump to .......kill his chances of winning. The only big difference is that no one is saying the emails from Podesta & Co. are fake...they're just fuming that they were hacked. Trump (if true) being exposed as having an affinity for "golden showers" isn't anything more than a sexual I right? Anyway, now that it's exposed (true or not), it makes the blackmail situation moot. Problem solved.

I wonder if McCain was that

I wonder if McCain was that shocked when he heard obama meddled in Israel’s election? So what is the difference? Furthermore, many nations meddled in the past election because considerable foreign money made its way into the clinton’s coffers. How else could they have spent 1.3 billion dollars in the campaign?