If Donald Trump’s 2024 triumph wasn’t a “landslide”, what exactly would it be called?
How big was it, really?
I’m not talking about the fish that got away, the size of the meal at your favorite value eatery or the relative hugeness of the Alpha puppy in the neighbor’s latest litter – speaking more specifically of the proportion of the “landslide” president elect Donald J. Trump enjoyed last month in an election most conservatives described as “the most important in our lifetimes” prior to the vote.
It doesn’t take great exaggeration to suggest that pre-election polls forecasted a razor-tight margin between Trump and the truly awful Democrat cackling Kamala Harris, who, with bumbling idiot “Tampon Tim” Walz for a running mate, was purportedly on the verge of pulling an election steal comparable to 2020’s result. For everyone who’s paid attention to American politics the past five or so years realizes that this year’s Democrat duo was even more unprepared and unsuited for the work of leading the government than senile Joe Biden was himself.
So therefore, how could it be possible for Harris to prevail?
Thankfully, Trump did win, sparing most responsible Americans from the hard contemplative task of considering whether to continue to battle the onslaught of the “woke” left or whether to simply pack it in, embark on a long isolation holiday and figure out what non-politics activities to concentrate on for the foreseeable future.
Despite Trump’s triumph, there have been a good number of glass-half-empty-type folks who insist that the victor barely squeaked by, and that those who maintain the president-elect’s win was a “landslide” were simply mistaken. Who’s right? In an opinion piece titled, “Yes, It Was a Landslide,” J.T. Young wrote at American Greatness last week:
“Despite every conceivable disadvantage, Trump beat not one, but two Democrat nominees to win the presidency. Outright—not only in electoral votes but by almost 2.5 million votes. That is the definition of a landslide.
“Of late, Americans have suffered a surfeit of Democrats and their apologists saying something isn’t true when it patently is—that Joe Biden was capable of being president, that the Democrat elite wasn’t deposing Joe Biden when they drove him from the ticket, that Kamala Harris was his qualified replacement, that Joe Biden wouldn’t pardon Hunter. The list is endless; it stretches back in time and extends uninterrupted into it. But nowhere is Democrat denial greater than in their attempt to deny Trump’s November presidential landslide.
“Their reason is as obvious as the truth they are seeking to deny. They fear its repetition. They worry that Republicans will continue Trump’s conservative populism, and they know that next time 2024’s overwhelming advantages will be gone. Bad as November’s landslide was, the ones Democrats potentially face going forward could be far worse.”
The thought brings a smile to every Trump backer’s face, doesn’t it?
I don’t know about you, but when it became evident Trump had won late into the evening on Election Night, my mind wandered to the future. To say the least, I knew it would be challenging to maintain momentum all the way to Election Day 2026 – and 2028 – so it was more comforting to settle for happiness in the moment.
But could we truly extrapolate lasting realization from what happened this year?
Like Young alludes to, Democrats and Trump’s GOP establishment enemies – you know who you are – are most terrified that the 2016 and 2024 winner has discovered the “secret” to sustainable ballot box longevity. Almost as though Trump and his backers have found the waters from the fountain of youth or the elusive cure for every terminal disease known to twenty-first century mankind, the boobirds can’t stomach the probability that Trump did indeed achieve the nearly-impossible (particularly for Republicans in today’s politics) landslide win that the media folks-in-the-know wouldn’t even talk about prior to November 5th.
In asserting Trump did rack up the “landslide” his backers have talked about, it’s akin to Trump visiting the golf practice range and uncovering the “secret” every golf enthusiast is forever in pursuit of. How many times have avid players (myself included, once upon a time) pondered over a thought that would make my swing more repeatable and proficient than the most legendary of pros only to hit a few balls and unceremoniously conclude, “That ain’t it after all”?
Trump did indeed latch onto a winning combination of issues, and, through about a decade’s practice doing interviews, answering media queries, getting into verbal scraps with “fake news” media members and touring the country delivering rally speeches to mass audiences, he honed a pretty solid political machine that runs on perpetual human energy and could possibly win another election today if need be.
The “secret” for Trump was out in 2024. But, as some folks I know have pointed out, his supposed “coattails” were limited.
A landslide? Maybe. But how about a wave and coattails?
From one observer I communicate with regularly and whose opinion I respect:
“As much as this was a ‘Hewwge’ victory, it was not the wave election we really needed to have more lasting change. The US Senate result was +4, but it was bound to change with the Dems defending 23 seats. WV was a layup. MT was a short jump shot. OH is amazingly red for its rust belt location. PA was a nice pickup. Trump did not have coattails in NV, AZ, WI, and MI that would have made a wave. Bummer! The map is flipped in '26, which could mean trouble ahead.
“The US House? R's -1. This is kind of ugly. I think a large part of it is big state gerrymanders, I mean CA and NY are a joke, but petty R House infighting left a bad taste, and I have to believe that this is where some ground game issues hurt.”
This is certainly an insightful analysis, though, as I told him in my reply, that it discounts the impressiveness of what Trump pulled off this year. Yes, Republicans fell short of where they’d hoped to be in the congressional totals, but Trump’s final numbers outperformed every single Republican senate candidate. That’s no small feat.
And the value of incumbency shouldn’t be dismissed, either. Taking on and defeating Democrat incumbents in “swing states” where the margins were bound to be close is a daunting challenge. Incumbents in Nevada and Wisconsin (and open seat incumbent party D’s in MI and AZ) started out with tremendous advantages. Republicans finally managed to bump off a sitting senator in Pennsylvania, but the Trump side scrapped and clawed for every vote there.
The House? Who can explain the tally, other than the Democrats’ money advantage had to show up somewhere. Republicans haven’t discovered the “secret” on the micro level, that’s for sure.
Does this portend Republican gains going forward?
Analysts and historians have a few years to debate the lasting impact of Donald Trump on the American national political scene, and the events of the next few years will have a lot to say as to how permanent Trump’s MAGA coalition really is – or if Trump’s 2024 coalition unravels similar to the way Ronald Reagan’s did after he left office.
Long term political achievement is fleeting and voters – or the middle 20 percent or so that is open to changing their minds – don’t value loyalty to a movement as much as they do to a person.
Time will reveal how long the 2024 electorate actually lasts – and if 2024 really was a “landslide”. Either way, the work is just beginning. Something to think about as the holidays provide a break from the usual back-and-forth.
Joe Biden economy
inflation
Biden cognitive decline
gas prices,
Nancy Pelosi
Biden senile
Kamala Harris candidacy
Donald Trump campaign
Harris Trump debates
J.D. Vance
Kamala vice president
Speaker Mike Johnson
Donald Trump assassination
Donald Trump
2024 presidential election
Tim Walz
J.T.Young's enthusiasm is wonderful, but how the Republicans act during the next year or so will make the difference in 2026. They must be more unified than in the past and supportive of Trump policies. If they act on behalf of their voters rather than big money lobbiests, they will be more successful in the long run. If they do well, we can then call it a landslide.