Search Results

Kamala Harris really, really, thinks Donald Trump is a bad guy. At the outset, it’s probably a given not many people remembered that Wednesday night was supposed to hold a second Donald Trump/cackling Kamala Harris presidential debate (format according to the same rules as Trump’s CNN forum with senile Joe Biden back in late June). In his infinite wisdom, however, Trump opted not to meet Harris again on ground of her own choosing, knowing full well his reception might end up like the one he endured last month (on September 10 in Philadelphia) from ABC’s now infamous debate moderators.   The key mystery going into the evening, therefore, was how many traditional Democrat constituencies cackling Kamala could successfully pander to simultaneously, as she appears to be way behind senile Joe Biden’s pace with most of them from four years ago. Every Democrat group shows leakage towards Trump, maybe except for single females (of all ethnicities and religions) and possibly college educated (indoctrinated?) white suburban voters, the core group in the Trump hating loose Never Trump coalition.   Whereas white suburbia (think Orange County, California) was once thought of as a Republican base group, cultural changes over the past decades has moved these socially liberal do-gooders into the Democrats’ LGBTQIA+++ tolerant camp. With abortion as their mantra, the white holier-than-though troops march to a different drum these days. No wonder Kamala caters to them.   As would be expected for a program hosted by CNN, there appeared to be a healthy representation of swamp establishment white voters in the audience, the “undecided” fence sitters who didn’t look as though they were all that undecided to me. It could be argued Anderson Cooper himself represents these people. Isn’t he a Vanderbilt? (For those who don’t know, the late designer jeans maven Gloria Vanderbilt was his mom)   But Harris surely has ground to make up with a lot of classifications who were once considered “safe” Democrat votes. Everyone who’s paid attention to the news lately realizes Barack Obama, among others, has been traveling the rust belt imploring young black men to ditch their misogynistic tendencies and embrace cackling Kamala – you know, just a few more percentage points in the right places could make all the difference for her.   Likewise, Hispanic voters, according to multiple surveys, put Trump on nearly equal footing with the “turn the page” Democrat who’s toiled next to Joe Biden for these past three and a half years. Kamala had Hispanic voters to herself a couple weeks ago at the Univision town hall, so she could isolate them as a group in that setting, but the CNN town hall featured all colors of the rainbow, most likely including LGBTQIA+++ people. They want answers too!   What’s a sinking Democrat to do when confronted with so many challenges from citizens who might not have been pre-screened sufficiently to ask her only loaded questions where she could sound knowledgeable and intelligent?   No matter. Recognizing that her poll numbers have started to slip markedly, cackling Kamala accepted CNN’s invite to appear sans Trump, leaving the program and the spotlight all to herself. Further, the “moderator” questioning was done by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, who is most definitely in her corner in terms of promoting what’s left of her campaign.   The CNN host said the live audience was made up of 32 Pennsylvania Voters who said they’re persuadable. They would offer their own questions and their questions were not edited ( unlike an earlier town hall that Kamala and Liz Cheney attended, where only two questions were asked and both were provided for them ).   From the start, it was all Trump, Trump, Trump   It could easily be argued that if Kamala Harris didn’t have Trump to talk about, there’d be nothing for her to say. Like a Mean Girl whose very existence depends on her ability to obsess over her popular opponent, cackling Kamala fixates on Trump’s perceived flaws. To paraphrase Cady Heron from the “Mean Girls” movie, Kamala talks about Trump 80 percent of the time and the rest of the time she’s waiting for someone else to bring him up so she can talk about him some more.   And if you can bring in Trump’s backers to the political conversation, it’s a bonus. Cooper’s first question involved Trump supporters, the tens of millions who will vote for the Republican nominee. “What would you say to them?”   Harris’s answer echoed the attacks cackling Kamala’s been leveling at Trump, lately, citing and quoting all the former Trump staffers who now insist he’s too “unstable” to serve as commander in chief. Harris said it herself, these aren’t “political people” who worked with Trump, mainly suggesting that these weren’t Trump loyalists to begin with.   Kamala repeatedly cited former Trump Chief of Staff John Kelly who allegedly said Trump was a big admirer of Hitler’s generals, and Trump’s former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley, who described Trump as “Fascist to the core.” Therein highlighted one of the most glaring mistakes Trump made in his first administration, trusting military leaders just because of their careers and supposed dependability because they had attained high ranks in the military.   Or like voters would be hankering to believe the word of government hacks wearing uniforms, all who hate Trump. Why do you think Trump is so popular in the first place now?   Kamala’s been saying this a lot lately, citing Trump’s people, including former vice president Mike Pence, to reinforce her point that Trump shouldn’t be granted a second term. That’s right. Some of his old underlings don’t like him, many of whom he trusted with important positions yet ended up stabbing him in the back.   Since when do the employees get to determine the wisdom of policy? Has anyone ever been at a job where they got to weigh in on the feasibility or desirability of what they were instructed to do?   The whole argument is absurd, but this is what Kamala Harris’s campaign has devolved into – an attack Trump’s character all-out assault. She knows she can’t beat him by talking about her record or her policy agenda, so she must resort to personal smears that haven’t worked for years. Everyone knows Trump by now. Can she rely on hearsay evidence from faceless anti-Trump morons to win her case for electability?   Doubtful. But Harris’s answer set the tone for the evening. Bash Trump. Bash Trump. And if this doesn’t work, bash him some more.   “I do believe Donald Trump is a fascist and I think the people who know him best should be trusted on this subject,” cackling Kamala replied to Cooper who queried whether the candidate herself believed Trump to be a fascist.   “Donald Trump himself said he wanted to terminate the Constitution of the United States.” He did? When did he say that? What a scumbag liar Kamala is. Pathetic.   Wow, that’s a good way to unite the country when it’s all over. But then again, Trump has said Kamala is a communist (much closer to the real definition), so I suppose it’s fair game in a presidential campaign.   Kamala’s looking old and worn out. Can she handle the pressure?   Kamala Harris prays… sometimes twice a day. Looks to me like she needs divine assistance.   Much was made in recent days – by Trump himself – of how cackling Kamala is lazy and not serious because she’s taken time off to practice for interviews rather than hitting the campaign trail and asking for people’s votes. As everyone knows, Democrats have asserted that Trump’s age and physical condition are issues in the 2024 campaign, so why shouldn’t Trump be able to return the favor?   Kamala just turned 60 years old this past Sunday. 60 years of age isn’t “old” by anyone’s estimation, but Harris doesn’t act like a spring chicken, either. This may be the product of the male/female politician double standard, but the wear and tear from the rigors of the campaign have apparently caught up to poor ol’ (young?) Kamala. Maybe it was what she was wearing, a black suit that made her look as though she’d been to a funeral, but Kamala was careworn on Wednesday evening. Who knows, maybe she doesn’t take to televised events that start after nine o’clock eastern time, but sleepy Kamala appeared lethargic and tuned-out for much of the evening.   Contrast this to Trump himself who seems like he gets his second wind as the hours go by, and viewers certainly must’ve noted the distinct difference in personal energy. Harris has lucked out over the years by often standing next to senile Joe Biden, who always appears as though he’s ready for a nap at every opportunity, but do Americans really want this whiny, inarticulate leftist word salad-spouting hag to be their president?   Kamala haunted by the war in the Middle East. It will be her downfall   One woman who claimed to be unaffiliated but also a Democrat “leaning towards” voting for Harris, pointedly asked the candidate, “What will you do to ensure that not one more Palestinian dies because of a bomb funded by U.S. tax dollars?”   Kamala rubbed her eyes as her brain must’ve been exploding at having to answer a question phrased in such a way. All along Harris has insisted her support for Israel was unwavering, always qualified by the need to resolve the conflict quickly and humanely. Translation: Cut it out, Israel! Your success is killing my campaign in Muslim-heavy Michigan!”   Instead, she answered that the Palestinian deaths have been “unconscionable”, and that with (Hamas leader Yahya) Sinwar’s death, there is an opportunity to bring the conflict to a close – and devise a two-state solution. She neglected to mention how Sinwar is dead solely because of the proficiency of the Israeli defense forces, but that’s another matter.   Kamala also fielded a question on anti-Semitism which she deflected by saying we need “conversations” about how the haters are being insensitive. And then brought the discussion back to John Kelly again and how Trump is an admirer of dictators, is a fascist, blah, blah, blah.   It must be a terrible ideological prison to be Kamala Harris. She feels like she has to play to all sides to get people to like her – and fails miserably in the process. Hillary Clinton tried to make the election about Trump’s perceived ethics foibles in 2016 and crashed and burned. Now, someone within the Democrat consultant hierarchy is telling cackling Kamala to do the same. How else did John Kelly creep into an answer on what she’d do about anti-Semitism?   She complains. She criticizes (Trump). And she babbles. I wonder if John Kelly now regrets having said anything publicly about Trump, especially now that he’s become the centerpiece of Harris’s campaign closing argument. Talk about unanticipated consequences.   Kamala is an awful candidate. Everyone knows it. But that doesn’t mean she must keep reinforcing the point for Donald Trump’s benefit.   Dang town halls! These rubes keep asking me about stuff I don’t want to talk about! Can’t we just drone on about abortion…?   No doubt, Kamala Harris did not anticipate that immigration would be such a big deal in 2024. She must’ve felt she could redirect the issue by talking about the stupid and wholly ineffective “bipartisan” immigration bill this year or place blame on Trump for the failure to complete the wall, etc., like he’d promised to do.   And grocery costs? Inflation? What does that matter? We’ll just hand out more federal money!   But what about all the second-tier subjects? She’s just as bad at those, too!   While supposedly answering a question on whether she would work to expand the Supreme Court, cackling Kamala babbled some response about the judges on the court and protecting a woman’s right to make decisions about her body (code for unlimited abortion), Harris looked directly at Cooper and observed “We haven’t even addressed the subject of ‘enemies within’ and how Trump would weaponize the justice department to go after political opponents.”   Isn’t that the pot calling the kettle… Indian?   Kamala usually found a way to sidestep issues she truly didn’t want to answer, like one man who asked about why she had changed her position on so many topics (FRACKING! FRACKING! FRACKING!), and what she supports now.   Cooper: Do you think that fracking is bad for the environment?   Hearing this, Harris pivoted to talking about green energy and how great it is. Then, I don’t recall for sure, she tore into Trump for some reason. Who knows. Maybe I’m getting it confused with the rest of her discussions, which usually tangentially addressed what she was queried about and then meandered into a nonsensical word salad about how awful Trump was and how much he hates the Constitution and how much it’s about himself and how he will be a dictator on day one, etc. etc. etc.   Poor Anderson Cooper. Even a liberal like him occasionally tried to stop her from running on about Trump. Didn’t always work. It’s sad.   Winners and losers   As would be expected, Kamala Harris was the only participant in this CNN town hall featuring a number of Pennsylvanians who are allegedly confused about who to vote for. By the looks on their faces and body language, I’d say cackling Kamala didn’t help her case much.   The election in Pennsylvania, as it does in so many other places, basically boils down to whether or not voters will put aside their reservations about Trump’s personality. Issues aren’t a problem. But Trump’s haters are gonna hate, no matter what.   They don’t like Kamala either, that was clear on Wednesday night. But will they listen to their heads or go with their “hate Trump” hearts?   One final note – Trump was wise to not agree to “debate” Harris again. It wouldn’t have been fair, and he has nothing to gain by climbing into the ring with her. Donald Trump is a tough guy, but I’m not sure even he could match the desperate ferocity of Democrats like cackling Kamala and the rest of the unhinged liberal opposition. If the polls are correct – that Trump is poised to win – prepare yourself for the turmoil to come.   Harris says Trump is a “fascist”. Does America come back from such hyperbole? Joe Biden economy inflation Biden cognitive decline gas prices, Nancy Pelosi Biden senile Kamala Harris candidacy Donald Trump campaign Harris Trump debates J.D. Vance Kamala vice president Speaker Mike Johnson Donald Trump assassination Donald Trump 2024 presidential election Tim Walz

You can’t make this up. Two weeks ahead of the election, the Biden-Harris border report is in, revealing more than 2.1 million migrant encounters at the US-Mexico border this fiscal year- excluding 'gotaways' and the 30,000 Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan  (CHNV) parolees flown to cities near YOU, at taxpayer expense! According to a recently released statement by House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Mark E. Green, MD (R-TN), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has admitted to the Committee, in documents obtained via subpoena, that all those who are making use of the Harris-Biden parole programs are otherwise inadmissible, but they are being released into the country anyway. In other words, the Border Czar Harris’s administration has simply been playing a massive shell game, trying to make the crisis look contained, when in reality, the outcome is the same—tens of thousands of inadmissible aliens being released into American communities every month.   The numbers below demonstrate how the border crisis exploded under Biden and Harris and should serve as a stark warning to all Americans of the consequences of open-borders, anti-enforcement policies. To add insult to injury- the Biden-Harris Administration took a VICTORY LAP for these border numbers. Saying " the Biden-Harris Administration has taken effective action. " This is Border Czar Kamala Harris’ 'effective actions' at the border:    *         Last week, it was revealed the border cameras detecting getaways are completely inoperable and down in places across the southern border! They have NO IDEA how many people have actually crossed. *         Known 'gotaways' nationwide is UP 283.7% under Biden-Harris than President Trump (that we know of). *         In this fiscal year alone, Kamala Harris has let in OVER 850,000  Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelans via a cell phone app and over 530,000 via the CHNV migrant flights (all at taxpayers' expense). *         This was the second-worst year in terms of inadmissible alien encounters ever—only surpassed by the all-time record Biden-Harris set last fiscal year. *         Encounters nationwide TRIPLED under Biden-Harris since President Trump secured the border. *         Terrorist watchlist under President Trump's term: 14, under Biden-Harris, it's the highest in HISTORY at 392 potential terrorists. *         9,055 Pounds of Fentanyl have come to our borders under Kamala Harris. *         Over 64,174 Chinese Nationalists have shown up on America's doorstep under Border Czar Kamala Harris, UP 1,035 % since President Trump secured the border.   This will be the last border numbers report before the election, and many Americans don't believe the data coming out of this White House. It's true; look no further than the jobs reports  that claimed the Biden-Harris Admin created nearly a million fake jobs that never actually existed- or the revised FBI crime report  that claimed crimes were down in areas and was later quietly revised to show crime spikes.    Why do they have consistent errors and massive revisions in their data- it's simple: it’s by design, and just another desperate attempt by the Biden-Harris Administration to convince Americans that their agenda hasn't been a total failure. Spoiler: it has been.    Bottom Line: Elect Donald J. Trump and secure our borders and our country- AGAIN.   Read More: The Biden-Harris Border Crisis, By the Numbers 2024 Election 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Military Readiness Cultural Marxism Hispanic male voters Male African-American voters Democrat contributions price gouging price controls first-time home buyers 25th Amendment public housing ActBlue donations Donald Trump campaign Kamala Harris campaign Kamala Harris senate record

There are few more despicable human beings involved in today’s politics than former Republican U.S. Representative Adam Kinzinger. Kinzinger, while in Congress, was one of the original vectors of Trump Derangement Syndrome or TDS. He has been at the center of virtually every attempt to destroy Donald Trump and stymie the America First agenda; first, by voting against policies supported by most Republican voters and later by voting for the phony Ukraine impeachment of President Trump. He also voted to create, and was subsequently appointed to serve on, the select committee to investigate the January 6, 2021, United States Capitol protest that later destroyed its records, suborned false testimony from witnesses and ruined the lives of numerous innocent J6 protestors. Now he is running around the country campaigning for Democrats who oppose everything he claimed to stand for when he ran for Congress as a Republican. A big part of Kinzinger’s fake political persona is his service in the Air Force Special Operations Command and the macho vibe he tries to sell as a former Air Force pilot. Above is an Air Force PR photo of then-Congressman Kinzinger’s play-along with a 22nd Training Squadron Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) specialist in an urban evasion tactics familiarization demonstration as part of his Aug. 3, 2015, visit to Fairchild Air Force Base, Wash. Kinzinger, holding a pistol, is the middle person in the three-man string. The Air Force’s SERE School is an internationally recognized program to equip pilots and other "at-risk of isolation personnel" with the mental and physical tools needed to avoid or survive capture. It is unclear to us what level of SERE training Kinzinger achieved, but he was certainly a likely candidate for the more advanced courses. The number one point on the list of skills needed for survival starting with the basic class is “use weapons properly and effectively.” Given Kinzinger’s military background and the machoman vibe he likes to project we were astonished at what we saw when pictures surfaced on social media of his shooting outing with pro-abortion, pro-gun control Democrat Lucas Kunce, the Democrats’ longshot candidate against Republican Josh Hawley in Missouri’s U.S. Senate election. There were Kinzinger and Kunce shooting AR-style modern sporting rifles at steel targets just steps in front of the firing line. Checking the pictures it is hard to know where to start the analysis of how unsafe, irresponsible and just plain dumb Kinzinger and Kunce are as they handle firearms in front of a group of supporters, journalists and staff. Let’s start with the obvious – shooting a scoped rifle at steel targets five or six yards away isn’t much of a challenge, but it is very dangerous given the prospect of bullet fragments or ricochets hitting someone on the firing line. Shooting steel targets that close is even dumber without using eye protection, as Kinzinger has his glasses on top of his head, not in front of his eyes. And then there’s the stance and the way he has his rifle shouldered… and is that Tannerite? Oy Vey. And true to the immutable laws of the shooting sports, if one guy in the party is unsafe, then everyone is unsafe, so someone got hit. Missouri TV reporter Ryan Gamboa was predictably struck in the arm by a bullet fragment allegedly from a round fired by Lucas Kunce. Gamboa was later checked out at a nearby hospital as a precaution, according to KSHB 41, but is reportedly OK. According to reporting by the New York Post , Kunce is also a veteran who served 13 years in the Marines. Kunce has consistently emphasized his military service throughout his run and in television ads, with many featuring him using a gun to appeal to Missouri’s many Pro-Second Amendment voters. Where does Lucas Kunce stand on gun control, you ask? When asked “Do you generally support gun-control legislation?” Kunce answered "Yes" ( justfacts.votesmart.org ) "I've been in urban and rural Missouri, and everyone agrees that we need background checks and red flag laws so that we can prevent criminals, teenagers, and terrorists from accessing guns. The fact that Congress still hasn't been able to pass these is a disgrace. We need to abolish the filibuster and pass commonsense gun safety legislation. We also need to invest in training programs. When I joined the Marines, I wasn't just handed a weapon. I went through extensive background checks and proper training. Training programs will help reduce gun violence and create safer communities." ( justfacts.votesmart.org ) Strangely left out of Kunce’s list of those who should be prevented from accessing guns are grandstanding Democrats seeking political office. Perhaps “training programs will help reduce gun violence and create safer communities,” but first you must be smart enough and diligent enough to actually follow your training, and Kinzinger and Kunce have obviously failed both those tests. CHQ Editor George Rasley  is a Glock ® certified pistol armorer, firearms instructor, range safety officer and a veteran of over 300 political campaigns, including every Republican presidential campaign from 1976 to 2008. He served as lead advance representative for Governor Sarah Palin in 2008 and has served as a staff member, consultant, or advance representative for some of America's most recognized conservative Republican political figures, including President Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp. A member of American MENSA, he served in policy and communications positions on the House and Senate staff, and during the George H.W. Bush administration he served on the White House staff of Vice President Dan Quayle. He is a member of Gun Owners for Trump. 2024 Election 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Military Readiness Cultural Marxism Hispanic male voters Male African-American voters Democrat contributions price gouging price controls first-time home buyers 25th Amendment public housing ActBlue donations Donald Trump campaign Kamala Harris campaign Kamala Harris senate record

“Are you better off than you were four years ago?” – Ronald Reagan on October 28, 1980 , making his closing argument in the only presidential debate with incumbent Democrat president Jimmy Carter in that fateful year. Many a political observer has labeled Reagan’s inquiry the most memorable and effective finishing statement of any campaign in history. I recall watching the debate as a seventh grader, thinking Reagan had encapsulated his entire campaign in just one statement. My parents had talked about Reagan quite a bit, so there was never any doubt the way our family leaned in that critical election. But with TV news the way it was in those days, it was inspirational to see The Gipper go head-to-head with Carter and lay it all on the line with his legendary question to the American people.   Watch the clip again and you’ll see Reagan also alleged that if you answered ‘yes’, then you knew who to vote for. Imagine a politician in 2024 suggesting it was okay to vote for the other party if you felt your situation was such that a change wasn’t needed. Today, neither the Republicans nor Democrats would feel strongly enough to grant a license no matter how he or she felt about the potential answer from the viewers.   But Reagan was an extraordinary man in extraordinary times. In a scenario eerily familiar even today, America was struggling with a dark and unfamiliar enemy, Iran, that threatened us in ways that weren’t visible to the naked eye. There were other worrisome adversaries, too, as the Soviet Union and the possibility of a nuclear confrontation was at the forefront of our minds.   For those who may not recall, America had boycotted the Olympics in Moscow that previous summer, president Carter declaring that the Soviet presence in Afghanistan forced us to stay home rather than take part in games that would justify the communist regime’s aggressiveness. People were feeling down about America’s future, not only economically, but also our ability to contend with ideological competition the world over.   To synopsize, there were: hostages in Iran, a resurgent Soviet threat; defiant terrorists in the Middle East; high inflation; skyrocketing interest rates; low consumer confidence; concerns about the American Dream being a thing of the past, etc. Does this sound like today?   It’s no wonder Reagan won such a convincing victory a week later in the election. Just like I’d seen the debate, I remember watching the vote returns and calls on Election Night in 1980. I didn’t understand the intricacies of all the issues back then, but I do recall that I felt good about the prospect of Ronald Reagan leading the nation as president as I entered my teen years.   Are you better off today than you were four years ago? Americans aren’t swayed now, either. In an article titled “Gallup poll: Most Americans worse off than four years ago”, Sean Salai reported at The Washington Times  this week :   “Most Americans say their families are worse off than four years ago, according to a Gallup poll that finds economic concerns at a level not seen since Bill Clinton won the presidency in 1992.   “Gallup reported Friday that 52% of adults responding to a recent survey said they and their families were in poorer shape financially than before President Biden took office. That’s the highest in presidential election-year surveys going back to 1984, and the most since 46% said the same in October 1992, the polling company noted.   “Another 39% of surveyed adults said they were better off than four years ago, and 8% said they were ‘about the same’ as in 2020. ‘The higher-than-usual percentage of U.S. adults who say they are worse off this year is largely owing to Republicans’ much greater likelihood to say this than opponents of the incumbent president’s party had been in prior election years,’ Mary Claire Evans, a Gallup researcher, wrote in a summary of the findings.”   To be accurate, it’s fair to say there’s a sizable percentage of the public who would never answer “yes” to the “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” question. Many Americans probably don’t remember what the circumstances were the last election cycle, but they do have an idea of how they felt four years ago. In most cases, in November, 2020, we were just coming out of the COVID fright and change was slow, slow, slow.   Many kids were still under some level of lockdowns in schools. There were restrictions on freedoms. There supposedly was a vaccine in development that would prevent people from getting sick, but its availability was still in dispute – and no one knew if it would be effective after such a short trial time. Businesses were still recovering.   Too many citizens were unsure about the future. The government lied for so long and so unconvincingly that pessimism and distrust were high. Government had covered up some of the economic pain by subsidizing the people out of work. I remember restaurants and fast food places were under requirements to either put “social distance” in their dining rooms or continue to offer curbside-only pickup.   Culture had changed, in addition. School children were ordered to attend classes via computer link. Absurd mask mandates were still in force. We most definitely weren’t better off than we’d been a couple years before. Thanks to the Democrats and the demagoguery of senile Joe Biden, millions of Americans blamed Trump for the China virus, even though he’d been the one who’d encouraged alternative solutions to those propounded by Dr. Anthony Fauci and the federal health tyrants as well as pleaded to open the economy back up.   The economic pain for many was yet to come because of the 2020 outcome. The federal supplements authorized along straight party lines in early 2021 began to dry up. The price of gasoline had already risen dramatically. Totals at the grocery store were just beginning to elevate. Shortages were everywhere. The economy hadn’t fully recovered and wouldn’t for some time. When things began to feel “normal” again, Americans realized we were stuck with a decrepit, truth challenged idiot for a president.   The feeling persists. No wonder Gallup found that the “Are you better off?” sentiment lingers on. Not only are people finding their money doesn’t go nearly as far as it used to, there’s little prospect that things will improve under the current regime, either. Cackling Kamala Harris is trying to convince voters that more federal money is the answer, along with targeting businesses that may be involved in “gouging” the public. Tell me, who is doing well in today’s economy?   Government, for one. Government bureaucrats never have to worry about getting fired. And they get regular raises whether the conditions or individual performance merit them or not. The government is always hiring. Ever heard of a bureaucrat getting laid off? Government doesn’t make anything and it’s insulated against belt-tightening. The percentage of people who answered they are “better off” than four years ago are probably those working for the federal, state or local entities.   This is not meant to smear or disparage individuals who are employed by the government. All of us probably know people who work for an agency or the military or are employed by the octopus that has its tentacles in every direction. It’s not possible to avoid. But the pervasiveness of government isn’t helping with the “better off” feeling among the voters.   But only a fool would surmise that economic matters alone contribute to the “better off” dissatisfaction. So much of a population’s attitude towards their government and culture is determined by the leadership style of the governors themselves. America is not better off than it was four years ago. Think about how much has changed in that one presidential term and ask yourself the same question.   There can be little doubt that “woke-ness” has advanced markedly under senile Joe Biden and cackling Kamala Harris. What about culture killers like “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion”? Has any aspect of life improved because the government is keeping an eye on who gets hired and why? What about critical race theory? Democrats talk about “book bans” and the like, but they never cite the reasons why certain states seek to keep the material out of schools.   Parents feel helpless to stop it, too. They can’t object to boys being permitted to use girls’ bathrooms at school or if their district permits biological males to participate in girls’ sports. Are the athletes themselves “better off” when a human being with male hormones and genetics wins a competition with girls? Is being treated the same really improving the participation level?   Or is being forced to pay for sex change surgeries something that makes people feel better off? How about watering down or dismantling Title IX to include transgenders? Has this improved the greater society? Or just made folks resentful of being powerless to do anything about the changes?   Have things improved in foreign relations since Biden and Harris took over? Has the immigration situation gotten better or worse? How about crime in the cities? Does it benefit all Americans for the federal government to fly illegal immigrants to places where they will live? Have the legal residents of Springfield Ohio grown as people because illegal squatters have been thrust upon them?   Do Americans think the nation is in a better situation diplomatically? Has allowing Iran to continue influencing and financing its proxies made the world a better place? How about spending hundreds of billions on weaponry for Ukraine? Or empowering the federal justice department to detain, try and punish peaceful January 6 protesters? Not all of them were violent. Most of them were just caught up in the melee.   Liberals don’t want Americans to answer the “better off” question because the only ones who answer in the affirmative are the people paid by Democrats. Advocates for traditional American values and limited government certainly don’t see their lives as improved. If Democrats are worried about the pessimistic attitude among “regular” people, they should be.   In a lot of ways today, it reminds them of how they felt in 1980 when Reagan originally posed the “better off” question. Donald Trump will restore their confidence. Joe Biden economy inflation Biden cognitive decline gas prices, Nancy Pelosi Biden senile Kamala Harris candidacy Donald Trump campaign Harris Trump debates J.D. Vance Kamala vice president Speaker Mike Johnson Donald Trump assassination Donald Trump 2024 presidential election Tim Walz

Back in 2020 in his “ It’s the Ballgame ” memo to the conservative movement, CHQ Chairman Richard A Viguerie made the case that the future of our constitutional republic would be determined by the 2020 election – and many of his predictions and worst fears about where a Biden-Harris victory would take our country have proven to be correct. However, the Democrats’ project to fundamentally transform America into a post-constitutional Marxist state has yet to be fully accomplished, and they are getting desperate as Kamala Harris’s campaign has begun to flag under the weight of a lackluster economy and citizen rejection of open borders and the oppressive hand of Democrat-run government in every aspect of their lives. This Democrat panic over the prospect of a second Trump administration bent on reform and draining the DC Swamp has caused some prominent Democrats to say the quiet part out loud – they are not planning on going quietly and peacefully transferring power to Donald Trump a second time. If our analysis is correct, what can you, the patriotic American who believes in constitutional liberty and the values of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness do to protect yourself, your family and our country?   One answer to that complex question is to download and read “ Insurrection and Violence - A Citizen’s Guide ” from our friends at www.unconstrainedanalytics.org and then follow the advice they have assembled from experienced and proven analysts on intelligence, crime, politics, revolutionary warfare, history, survival, and trauma medicine.   “ Insurrection and Violence - A Citizen’s Guide ” will equip you with many important tools for the work and dangers ahead, but perhaps the book’s most important contribution to surviving and defeating the coming revolutionary unrest is in the Chapter 2 analysis of the current situation which explains who constitutes the enemy in this civil war. As the authors explain, it is not just BLM, ANTIFA or criminal gangs, we are under attack by an ‘insurgency syndicate’ employing unconventional warfare tactics. And this North American Insurgency Syndicate (NAIS) is currently gaining strength, and they are on the offensive – just look at the riots in support of the murderous Hamas terrorists for evidence that this anti-constitutional insurgency syndicate is everywhere from small college campuses to major cities.   The point of this chapter-length analysis is to increase your “situational awareness.” The book describes the current situation in the United States – that we are at a critical point where the NAIS is successfully exploited a national emergency to rapidly gain strength. The authors provide a synopsis of the various and disparate insurgent organizations and movements that are involved in direct-action violence, harassment, agitation, and social media attacks.   Then the authors explore the syndicate structure. At the tactical level, the NAIS relies upon self-organizing groups of insurgents united for insurrection. The syndicate, waging unconventional warfare with new and innovative tactics, intends to change or overthrow the government.   At the strategic level, the authors make the case that a clandestine organization has formed. It has built a hidden infrastructure with a shadow government, financial structure, political operations, media outreach, and international engagement. They have infiltrated counter-state, underground operatives into most federal, state and local government institutions. The NAIS is using a determined and effective strategy with a tactical ground fight, unrestricted political warfare, and unmatched information operations.   The authors also discuss the support that is required for the NAIS to be successful, and the support they are now receiving. Non-profit, charitable, and other entities are used to distribute funds to the NAIS. This is accomplished by washing money through multiple layers of numerous, geographically dispersed, and legitimate organizations.   In addition to domestic funding, the authors also demonstrate that the NAIS is receiving international support. Both China and Russia are involved because they directly benefit from U.S. instability and jihadi elements from the Muslim world are also present.   Even if you disagree with the assessment of the situation presented in Chapter 2 of the book, stay the course; and take a close look at Chapters 3 and 4, you will find valuable information designed to keep you and your loved ones safe and in Chapter 5 is a valuable list of resources to help equip you to navigate the days ahead.   You may be tempted to ask yourself if this is real, or just another conspiracy theory. “ Insurrection and Violence - A Citizen’s Guide ” lays out the facts and analysis that unmask the insurgency groups – some following communist ideology, some socialist, some anarchy, and some a confusing cocktail of all three ideologies. And the authors explain why this is different from the 1960s student uprisings and why it poses a significantly greater danger.   History provides many examples of past insurgent organizations with Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideology where they fully or partially achieved their end state. These revolutions either overthrew the government, pushed leaders out of office, or forced the government to the negotiating table. In all those cases, the existing government and its underlying institutions and structure were significantly or fundamentally altered.   This is the goal of Democrats and their NAIS allies, and the November 5, 2024 election is merely a Phase Line in that insurrection. If the election goes against them, be assured there is a plan for that contingency, and it doesn’t involve the peaceful transfer of power to Donald Trump.   This book by Unconstrained Analytics is a guide for all citizens that are concerned with the chaos and violence occurring on the streets of America, regardless of political outlook. Though much of the violence clearly has political intent and purpose, “ Insurrection and Violence - A Citizen’s Guide ” is not a political tract. The goal of the book is to explain the violence, who is perpetrating it, and give readers information on how to avoid becoming a victim. 2024 Election 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Military Readiness Cultural Marxism Hispanic male voters Male African-American voters Democrat contributions price gouging price controls first-time home buyers 25th Amendment public housing ActBlue donations Donald Trump campaign Kamala Harris campaign Kamala Harris senate record

Kamala Harris can’t help herself, observed a friend of ours in a privately circulated email.  Even though she has promised to chart a “New Way Forward” for America if elected President, she has proven to be an avid defender of everything she and Joe Biden have done over the past four years. What’s more, she has expressed no regrets for the havoc her policies have inflicted on the nation. It has become increasingly clear that the big-government policies of the current Administration have been formulated, advanced, and defended by activist Vice President Kamala Harris.   Our friend has allowed us to use some of the points made in her email provided we kept it anonymous, so here are a few datapoints to back up the contention that a “New Way Forward” is really just more of the same. Harris Defends  Her Abysmal Policy Record as V.P. on “The View” -Sunny Hostin: “Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past 4 years?” - Kamala Harris: “There’s not a thing that comes to mind.  I’ve been part of most of the decisions.”   Biden Touts Cooperation with Harris During DNC Speech -          “We’ve had one of the most extraordinary four years of progress ever.  Period. When I say “we,” I mean Kamala and me.”” Biden Confirms Harris’ Active Role in Administration During Press Conference -          “I'm in constant contact with her. She's aware, we're all singing from the same song sheet. She, she helped pass all the laws that are being employed Now, she was a major player in everything we've done, including passage of the legislation which we were told we could never pass. And so she's been -- and her staff is interlocked with mine, in terms of all the things we're doing.” Harris Plays Pivotal Role  Shaping Policy Through a Record Number  of Tie-Breaking Votes -          Joe Biden: “And guess who cast the tie-breaking vote [on the IRA]?  Vice President and soon-to-be President Kamala Harris.” Harris Celebrates  the Biden Administration’s “Accomplishments” and Legacy “Joe Biden’s legacy of accomplishments over the last 3 years, is unmatched in modern history. In one term he has already surpassed the legacy of most President’s that served two terms in office...”   Harris Was the “Last One in the Room”  for Afghanistan Withdrawal Decision Dana Bash: Were you the last person in the room? Kamala Harris: Yes. Dana Bash: And you feel comfortable? Kamala Harris: I do.   Biden Endorsement  of Harris “My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President. And it’s been the best decision I’ve made.”   Harris’ “Border Czar” Responsibilities “ @POTUS  asked me to lead our diplomatic work with Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. To address the situation at the southern border, we have to address the root causes of migration. It won’t be easy work—but it's necessary.”   Biden Calls Harris a "Real Leader"    and Emphasizes Her Importance “We are so fortunate to have a real leader, a true friend, and a historic Vice President in Kamala Harris. We couldn’t do this without you, Kamala.”   And Harris’s lamest of all claims that she is the candidate of change: Harris Reaffirms  Support of Biden Policy Record with Stephen Colbert - Stephen Colbert: “You are a member of the present administration, but under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be, and what would stay the same?” -Kamala Harris: “Sure, well I’m obviously not Joe Biden.” -Stephen Colbert: “I’ve noticed.” -Kamala Harris: “So that would be one change…”   To paraphrase the Wall Street Journal’s Jason Riley, Democrats changed the name at the top of the ticket when what’s really needed is a course correction, and someone from Ms. Harris’s wing of the party isn’t likely to provide it. Joe Biden’s re-election bid was flailing, only partially due to his age and infirmities. He was also struggling to convince voters that his prescriptions for everything from inflation and crime to immigration and foreign policy were preferable to what could be expected in a second Trump presidency. In choosing Kamala Harris, Democrats are offering more of the same, not the change voters are demanding. 2024 Election 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Military Readiness Cultural Marxism Hispanic male voters Male African-American voters Democrat contributions price gouging price controls first-time home buyers 25th Amendment public housing ActBlue donations Donald Trump campaign Kamala Harris campaign Kamala Harris senate record

“You can never have too much business – or too many friends.” Or, if you’re a politician – even one like Donald Trump – you can never have too many votes.   Close followers of this year’s presidential race recognize that it will be close. For months, somewhat defying common sense or on the ground reality, the contestants in the 2024 campaign have been locked in a tight contest to determine who will take control of the executive branch for the next four years. The back-and-forth nature of the race has been a constant source of irritation for Donald Trump’s supporters, most of whom believe it’s not possible that an ethically compromised woman like Kamala Harris could enjoy such a large and devoted following.   Trump, for all intents and purposes, has been the 2024 Republican nominee practically ever since he left office in January of 2021. After a couple month-long cooling down period that year, Trump began toying with the concept of running for president again. Having served one term – and come up short in his reelection bid – Trump was eligible to run if he so chose. The fact that Grover Cleveland had been the only prior president to serve two non-consecutive terms was no deterrent to the man who took on and beat the Washington swamp in 2016.   Trump’s tumultuous first four years didn’t discourage him, either. Traveling the country after he left office, Trump detected a great deal of support still existed for his political career. MAGA adherents were unsatisfied regarding the way Trump’s presidency had ended – and we’re not even talking about the unfortunate events of January 6, 2021.   When Trump formally entered the Republican primary race in late 2022, it wasn’t clear whether he would draw any committed competitors. Polls showed Trump with a substantial lead over possible competitors, but there also was a significant groundswell of backing for a not-Trump challenger. Most of the not-Trump movement was made up of Bush/McCain establishmentarians, the remnants of the neoconservative faction and those who simply were tired of Trump’s “act” and wanted someone else – anyone else.   Therefore, the 2024 Republican primary “race” never really materialized. Trump all-but refused to acknowledge any legitimate challengers, and most of those who did mount a campaign did so cautiously, sensing Trump would eventually win and not seeking to divide the party too much.   Except for Nikki Haley, of course. The former South Carolina governor and Trump U.N. ambassador lost each of the “early” voting states, most by large margins. Trump tolerated the interlopers, most of whom bowed out early and endorsed him as the inevitable Republican nominee. But still Haley hung on through Super Tuesday this year, even when it was clear there was no path to victory for her.   And when Haley finally did suspend her campaign, she didn’t endorse Trump. The bitterness between the two was evident for all to notice. Further, a good percentage of Haley’s backers, most of whom had followed her simply because they didn’t like Trump, showed little inclination towards joining the MAGA effort.   Trump acted as though he wouldn’t need them. Haley remained distant through the early part of summer. Nikki announced she wouldn’t support senile Joe Biden’s campaign, but held off using the “e” (endorsement) word until after Trump was nearly assassinated in early July. Then, in a sign that the party was coming together, Trump allowed Haley a prime time speaking slot at the Republican convention in Milwaukee.   But had their relationship truly healed at that point? Would Haley hit the campaign trail and ask her former supporters to throw their weight to Donald Trump now? Would Trump welcome them? Can a pol ever have enough votes?   All good questions. The mystery remains. In an article titled, “Trump expresses frustration about calls to deploy Haley”, Brett Samuels reported at The Hill  last Friday :   “Former President Trump expressed frustration Friday with repeated calls for him to deploy former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley (R) on the campaign trail ahead of Election Day, pointing to his strong GOP primary performance. ‘I’ll do what I have to do,’ Trump said when asked on ‘Fox & Friends’ if he would call Haley and ask her to campaign for him.   “’But let me just tell you: Nikki Haley and I fought, and I beat her by 50, 60, 90 points. I beat her in her own state. … I beat Nikki badly,’ Trump said. ‘I beat everyone else, too — badly. Frankly I set records. Both in speed and in the magnitude of the win. Everybody keeps saying that. They don’t say get Ron [DeSantis]. And Ron did very well.   “’And they keep talking about Nikki, Nikki. I like Nikki. Nikki, I don’t think, should have done what she did, and that’s fine that she did it,’ Trump said, referring to Haley’s decision to run against him. ‘But even in her own state — in South Carolina, where she was the governor — I beat her by a number. … And then they say, ‘Oh when is Nikki coming back in?’ Nikki is in. Nikki is helping us already.’”   By now, after years’ worth of intensive establishment media coverage, everyone knows Donald Trump is a prideful man who carries grudges and doesn’t let go of them easily. He also appears to have a long memory – especially for slights, perceived or intentional. But that being said, it’s unusual, or unwise, for Trump to take this kind of approach to asking Nikki Haley to talk with her former supporters about him.   And it’s a little curious Trump mentions Ron DeSantis in a semi-favorable light now because for roughly a half year or so, “DeSanctimonious” DeSantis was Trump enemy number one. The Florida governor deployed his full arsenal of political weaponry against Trump during the lead-up to the primaries, most likely figuring, after a while at least, that he had little chance to wrestle the MAGA coalition away from the much older man.   Politically speaking, Governor Ron ran his campaign with the future in mind, realizing Trump was virtually indestructible this cycle and leaving open the possibility he may want to run again in 2028. He’s a two-term governor in his mid-forties, leaving roughly 30-40 years ahead of him if governing and campaigning is really his cup of tea.   Nikki Haley didn’t bend, however. She doubled down. Further, she said some pretty nasty things about the primary winner at a time when he was facing the full wrath of the Democrat establishment prosecutors and judges – both local and federal – something Trump definitely didn’t appreciate. And then she didn’t endorse him right away when she did get out, continuing to receive thousands of votes in the remaining primaries, leaving the gaping wound festering and practically infected.   So it’s not surprising Trump isn’t jumping over hurdles to let bygones be bygones now. Haley’s contrition never appeared sincere, though it should be noted Trump said some pretty unflattering things about her, too. Calling Haley “birdbrain” was somewhat tame compared to the insults hurled by a few Trump surrogates, like Vivek Ramaswamy (who she called a “scum”) labeling her corrupt and implying her principles were for sale.   At some juncture Haley must have recognized her future prospects were somewhat dim. There’s no way she could compete in a primary race with the loyalty of the old party establishment and Democrats alone, though. If it wasn’t clear prior to 2024, it was confirmed this year that the Republican Party is the place for the working class and the anti-swamp elites.   But this doesn’t mean she couldn’t possibly assist Trump’s effort this late in the campaign. If for nothing else, her presence on the trail could help refute the influence of the RINOs who have become so prominent in cackling Kamala Harris’s last-ditch mission to brand Trump as “unstable” and so off-putting that 100 or so ex-Republicans removed themselves from the new MAGA Republican party and threw-in behind the dimwitted Democrat.   Put it this way – keeping Haley at arm’s length now won’t do anything to boost Trump. Trump’s claims that the party is as unified now as ever are basically true, but there are still many, many Republicans who are on the fence, not because they heartily disagree with the MAGA platform – they just don’t like the figurehead’s “tone” and personality.   Beyond the point, it seems Haley would be willing to actively campaign for Trump – if asked to show her support. The main ideological sticking point for Nikki and Trump would appear to be foreign policy, with Trump’s America First views not necessarily compatible with Haley’s discredited Bush neoconservative philosophy.   I’m assuming she still believes it, but Haley devoted a lot of her campaign to arguing for continued support for Ukraine, suggesting that fighting the Russians “over there” was superior to doing it here. Trump, on the other hand, argues that the war needs to end, period. It’s hard to tell what Trump would do once in office, but sending more tens of billions into the eastern European meatgrinder isn’t something bound to attract his favor.   Needless to say, both Haley and Trump are strong supporters of Israel in their war against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran. So there isn’t much distance between them there.   And there’s no guarantee Trump would want Haley to serve in the second Trump administration, since he probably doesn’t trust her to carry through with the agenda. But something could be worked out. Nikki will need Trump’s goodwill for a possible 2028 run in any case. There is much incentive for both to cooperate – to win this year.   If there’s still bad blood between Nikki Haley and Donald Trump, they’d best bury it before it’s too late. Trump obviously believes he can win without her – and he may be right. But where margins are close, you can never have too many votes. If Haley is willing to campaign for Donald Trump, he’d be wise to accept her offer. Joe Biden economy inflation Biden cognitive decline gas prices, Nancy Pelosi Biden senile Kamala Harris candidacy Donald Trump campaign Harris Trump debates J.D. Vance Kamala vice president Speaker Mike Johnson Donald Trump assassination Donald Trump 2024 presidential election Tim Walz

Is there anything that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won’t lie about? We ask this question because Harris’s rather sudden addition to her resume of a 1983 stint working at the McDonald’s on Central Avenue in Alameda, California set off our BS detector as soon as she started talking about it, and the burger giant has now issued a statement saying they have no record of Ms. Harris ever working for the company. Most Americans we know assume that politicians are going to sling a certain amount of baloney – and they are willing to accept it as harmless as long as it is on the level of stretching a gimme putt to a 50-footer or making their barely keeper trout out to be the reincarnation of “Jaws.”   However, lying about something substantive, like where you went to college, where you worked, your academic achievements, your military rank and experience are not easily forgiven by voters. The tale first surfaced when Harris told striking McDonald's workers on a Las Vegas picket line in 2019: "I worked at McDonald's. I did the french fries and I did the ice cream...If we want to talk about these Golden Arches being a symbol for the best of America, well, the arches are falling short." It's no surprise the company didn’t want to get sucked further into the political scrum surrounding Harris’s phony claim she worked there, even though the claim first surfaced as part of Harris’s demand the company raise wages as part of the Democrats’ “living wage” campaign that has driven many food service establishments out of business. Harris and Walz have turned lying about their resumes into an art form, and as Piers Morgan observed in a column for the New York Post, their lies are different because they go “right to the heart of the Democratic candidate’s persistent pitch that she is the truth antidote to fork-tongued Trump.” If you’re going to position yourself as a bastion of honesty, you can’t tell brazen, self-promoting “I’m middle class just like you” fibs about working at McDonald’s, concluded Mr. Morgan. What we found most interesting about the whole Kamala Harris working at McDonald’s lie is that Donald Trump called BS on it from the beginning, and his weekend campaign event taking a shift at a Pennsylvania Mickey Dees, was the perfect vehicle for smoking out the truth. "I'm gonna do everything... Oh, I'm going. Because she lied... We checked it out. Unless somebody comes up with something. We checked it out. They said she never worked there. She even picked the store. We went to the manager. The manager's been there forever. Do you remember her? 'No, she never worked here'. They know," Trump, teased on “Fox & Friends” last week, reiterating that Harris lied. According to the New York Post, “Well over a thousand MAGA-Donald’s faithful lined Street Road in Lower Southampton Township in an effort to meet Trump and say, ‘Hail to the chef’ at the McDonald’s in critical Bucks County, outside Philadelphia.” The hilarity of the germophobic billionaire and former President salting and scooping fries and bantering with customers and the media at the drive through window was just a prelude to the serious point of the event. “I’ve now worked for 15 minutes more than Kamala,” said Trump, showing Harris up to be a liar and demonstrating once again just how fake and inauthentic she is. 2024 Election 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Military Readiness Cultural Marxism Hispanic male voters Male African-American voters Democrat contributions price gouging price controls first-time home buyers 25th Amendment public housing ActBlue donations Donald Trump campaign Kamala Harris campaign Kamala Harris senate record

Last week the House Committee on Homeland Security (CHS) released a new “China Threat Snapshot” assessment, detailing recent instances of Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-related espionage and acts of transnational repression in the United States. The assessment also documents recent CHS legislative efforts to address these national security threats posed by the CCP.   “The Chinese Communist Party is not satisfied with destroying freedom and repressing its citizens within its own borders. Beijing has continually encroached upon American sovereignty to spy, intimidate, and harass not only defectors, but even American citizens,” Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green said. “To be clear, our adversary is not the Chinese people, but the threat that comes from the tyrannical regime that oppresses its own people, commits genocide, censors speech, and seeks to undermine representative government. It is important we remain clear-eyed about the threat the CCP poses to the security of the American people so we are prepared to counter its malign influence at every turn.” Among the key points in the Snapshot: *         Between 2000 and 2023 there have been 224 reported incidents of Red Chinese espionage directed at the United States.   *         About 80% of economic espionage prosecutions allege conduct that would benefit the Communist Chinese State, and there is at least some nexus to Red China in around 60% of all trade secret theft cases.   *         The FBI opens new cases to counter Communist Chinese intelligence operations roughly every 12 hours.   Chinese Communist Party-related threats to the homeland have grown rapidly in recent years. It is becoming increasingly evident that China’s oppressive arm reaches far beyond its own borders to actively oppose democracy, silence dissent, and spy on the United States. From February 2021 to August 2024, there have been over 55 CCP-related espionage cases in 20 states including the transmission of sensitive military information, the stealing of trade secrets, the execution of transnational repression schemes, and the obstruction of justice. Additionally, the Biden-Harris administration has overseen the largest influx of Chinese nationals illegally crossing the Southwest border than any previous administration. While the motivating factors driving Chinese nationals to cross the border are multifaceted, a thorough review is warranted due to the glaring security vulnerabilities at the border.  In FY24 alone, Border Patrol agents have recorded more than 36,000 apprehensions of Chinese nationals —more than all those recorded from FY07-20 combined . In March, the Committee released a “ Startling Stats ” fact sheet documenting the dramatic increase.  The potential national security implications of this unprecedented influx are concerning, as a Chinese national in the U.S. illegally breached a military base in California and refused to leave on March 29. Astonishingly, reports from last year revealed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ DHS had instructed Border Patrol agents to drastically reduce the number of vetting questions for Chinese nationals in order to more quickly process these aliens into the interior––potentially putting our homeland security at risk. According to Rio Grande Valley Sector Chief Patrol Agent Gloria Chavez in her transcribed interview with the Committee in September 2023, in order to interview and process Chinese nationals, her sector “had to go through a translation service. That translation service took about six to seven hours to interview a Chinese national. So that was very tasking on our end.” “Secretary Mayorkas’ willful and systemic refusal to comply with the laws of the United States and his breach of the public trust continue to incentivize a record number of inadmissible aliens to flock to our borders, putting themselves in harm’s way and straining our Border Patrol agents and Custom and Border Protection officers on the frontlines of the crisis,” Chairman Green said last week.“ Among these encounters were more Chinese nationals, totaling more in the first six months of this fiscal year than in all of Fiscal Year 2023. In the first half of FY24, 24,376 Communist Chinese nationals were encountered at the Southwest border, 24,214 of them apprehended illegally crossing the border. Encounters of Red Chinese nationals in March 2024 increased over 8,000 percent compared to March 2021, and have surpassed all of last fiscal year––just six months into FY24. March also marked a historic high for encounters along the busiest sector of the northern border, the Swanton Sector, which saw a nearly 50-percent increase compared to the previous March, and more than a 2,000-percent increase compared to March of FY21. More than 1,000 Communist Chinese nationals have crossed the northern border every month during the first five months of the fiscal year. This massive influx of Red Chinese nationals, most of them fit young men of military age, constitutes a clear and present danger to the national security of United States. Go to https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/vicepresident/ to contact Border Czar Vice President Kamala Harris, tell her you demand that this massive influx of enemy nationals be halted immediately and the border be closed to all unauthorized Communist Chinese entrants. 2024 Election Biden administration China policy Taiwan fentanyl illegal immigration China threat snapshot China spying Chinese Communist Party American sovereignty Department of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas

And then panic set in. It’s the uneasy feeling everyone experiences at some point when something unanticipated goes hopelessly wrong and there’s little or no time to change course. Like planning a wedding during the dry months in California and realizing on the day of the event that the rare rain shower that started up wasn’t going to dissipate before the ceremony, with no opportunity to move the service someplace dry.   Or realizing that the candidate your party nominated isn’t nearly as well-spoken or smart as her handlers made her out to be, and there’s a sinking feeling you’re stuck with her and the bozo she chose for a running mate. It’s a mistake not even Barack Obama, Big Bubba Bill Clinton or the entire lineup of Democrat fill-in stump speakers could fix in a short time.   At any rate, that same Democrat “mistake” candidate is making the rounds these days, still unable – or unwilling – to do what it takes to alleviate the feeling of dread many Democrats are undergoing. They realize they’re in dire shape… and panic has set in.   In an article titled “ Five reasons Democrats are starting to panic about Harris ”, W. James Antle III wrote at the Washington Examiner last week :   “A growing sense of unease has set in among Democrats, who fear a presidential election they thought they had won by switching the top of the ticket might be slipping away. Vice President Kamala Harris has abandoned her cautious media strategy, deigning to appear even on Fox News, a cable network both she and President Joe Biden were at pains to avoid earlier. So far, the results have been mixed at best.   “Liberal opinion leaders are urging their readers to ignore the polls, following a previous pattern of polling denial (or at least skepticism) that ended in acceptance that Biden was losing and citing the same polls to chase him out of the presidential race. Less than a month before his exit, Biden doubters were dismissed as the ‘bedwetting brigade.’   “Harris is still leading in the national RealClearPolitics polling average by 1.4 points. But Biden led by 9.4 points and Hillary Clinton by 6.7 at the exact same point in 2020 and 2016, respectively. Former President Donald Trump is for the third straight election cycle running stronger in the battleground states that will decide the Electoral College majority, and thus the presidency, than he is nationally. Harris’s current national lead is also smaller than Clinton’s final popular vote margin when she lost to Trump.”   Yes, we’ve heard it a lot lately, mostly from these same worried Democrats along with the gleeful Republican-favoring media members who see the narrow gaps as a sign from the heavens that Trump’s campaign racehorse will begin its “kick” at the top of the stretch with more than enough track before him to not only overtake cackling Kamala, but also leave her in his dust.   I’d be lying if I didn’t rely on similar reasoning to serve as the basis for my optimism. Part of it are the memories from Election Night 2016 – and 2020 – where the Republican defied the professional opinion samplers and vastly outperformed his projections. The phenomenon gave me confidence four years ago when I was certain, based on past precedent, that Trump’s Election Night leads would hold in the close states, and everything would turn out okay.   Alas, another four years of Trump, I thought. It was a good feeling, especially considering Trump had endured so much in his first term and would seek to not repeat his mistakes in his second go ‘round. Tell me it wasn’t a warm, fuzzy feeling?   But the morning brought back hard reality, as the predicted perils with lax security measures with mail-in votes proved to be too much for the legions of legitimate Election Day Trump voters. Watching those leads dwindle, then disappear, had to be one of the worst feelings of my entire life. And it’s the reason why I remain eternally cautious regarding the polls this time around.   But Democrats do appear to be anxious, for good reason. They’ve got a terrible, off-putting cackling candidate (who even Saturday Night Live does a good job in lampooning) with a feather-light resume, barely any political skills and a mound of baggage that would make a train boxcar handler envious to try and tote.   Nonetheless, Antle’s five reasons Democrats are panicking are: 1. The Trump factor 2. It’s the democracy, stupid 3. 2016 hangover 4. Fear is a good motivator 5. Democrats vs. Dick Cheney   The last one being the most noteworthy and particularly relevant these days. Democrats are soiling themselves over the notion that more than a hundred prominent Republicans have now “put country over party” and endorsed the absurd cackling monster, Kamala, simply because they hate Trump so much.   Harris herself held a rally last Wednesday in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, where she attempted to convince additional wayward Republicans to join with her to upset Trump’s plan to return to the White House to Make America Great Again. Kamala said it herself, that she and Tampon Tim Walz were searching for “Republicans of good conscience” to join her and “turn the page on the chaos and instability of Trump.”   The only problem being a bare majority of 2024 voters aren’t  turning the page on “chaos” because they care a lot more about Trump’s policy portfolio than they do about needing to endure his sometimes uneven personality quirks. Many folks I know aren’t huge fans of The Donald, but they do like his views on immigration, the economy and a host of other salient issues this cycle.   Besides, is cackling Kamala really a big improvement in terms of likable persona? Sheesh.   The fact that a token handful of establishment Republicans made the leap to get behind Kamala n’ Tampon Tim – including the Cheneys (Liz n’ Dick) – won’t be any comfort once unfortunate reality sets in that Kamala Harris went from the most unpopular vice president in history to the office of the president elect. If it actually transpired, that is.   More folks need to think this way. Then Trump would win and America would at least be on the pristine path to righting itself.   I also take issue with Antle’s characterization that Democrats are starting  to panic; no, they’re well on their way to a nervous breakdown of worry. Granted, Antle wrote this last week before cackling Kamala went on Fox News to face the steady Brett Baier, but Democrats’ fright has been on display for weeks, or at least since it became evident Harris’s “win” in the September 10 debate didn’t seal the deal for them.   Antle’s other reasons for panic are more palpable. “It’s the democracy, stupid” refers to the change in focus that occurred in Kamala’s campaign about the time she took over for senile Joe Biden. For as long as he’s been at the helm, the current president has been blathering on about how “democracy” is in peril because Trump is “a threat” and is “dangerous” to our American republic, simply for disagreeing with what Democrats believe in.   Then there was January 6th, which theoretically provided enough kindling for years’ worth of Democrat fires to accuse Trump and Republicans of “attacking” the capitol and trying to initiate an “insurrection” that endangered the life of Mike Pence, etc. Well, when Kamala came on board, it was only a week or so after the first assassination attempt on Trump’s life in July, and much of the “democracy” talk went by the wayside along with senile Joe himself.   Kamala has tried to revive the “Trump’s a danger to democracy” line of argument lately, but it’s not having much of an effect. Perhaps it’s because Trump was approached by a second would-be assassin last month and a third man was caught in California with firearms and designs on the candidate a couple weeks ago. It’s hard to be a “danger to democracy” when it’s the kooks on the left who are constantly going after you.   The 2016 hangover has to do with Democrats’ overconfidence in that year leading into Election Day, and the agony of defeat they experienced when the unthinkable actually happened – Trump won the election. Who can forget the dejected look on Democrats’ faces as they sat in that glass ceiling adorned building watching as their stupid “shatter it” dreams slowly went down the proverbial drain?   Democrats are terrified that the same contexts are repeating themselves this year. The similarities being the presence of Trump along with an unlikable female candidate who can’t articulate a vision that competes with Trump’s more aggressive proposals to deal with the harshest challenges facing the country.   Maybe being a single-issue (abortion), idea-less failure of a party has its drawbacks.   Democrats indeed must be petrified that Trump has more political lives than a cat. Just when they figured they’d gotten to him – two impeachments, the wave of phony lawfare cases, the January 6 Commission, hordes of liberal pundits proclaiming how awful he is practically every day and even the Never Trump faction in his own party led by past Republican presidential nominees (Romney, the McCain family, Paul Ryan) – and it hasn’t worked.   Trump is like the political version of the cyborg in the Terminator movies. He’s practically indestructible and will never, ever, stop – until he’s legitimately defeated. The fact that Trump is at least competitive this cycle is baffling to Democrats. How could it be that they’re all  wrong?   Keeping Democrats on edge that they might lose is a powerful motivator to sustain their contributions and doing the necessary work to guarantee that every grifter, abortion monger, “Woke” agenda promoter, transgender coddler and Tampon Tim Walz wussy boy will keep at it until the end. They still want to have a chance, don’t they?   Whether Democrats are truly in a panic is up for debate, but there’s no doubt they’re worried they will lose and they’re trying to figure out how to act. It’s not that they really like Kamala Harris that much – they don’t. But it’s got to be a helpless feeling watching Trump do his act and Republicans looking forward to wearing MAGA hats in public again. Panic, indeed. Joe Biden economy inflation Biden cognitive decline gas prices, Nancy Pelosi Biden senile Kamala Harris candidacy Donald Trump campaign Harris Trump debates J.D. Vance Kamala vice president Speaker Mike Johnson Donald Trump assassination Donald Trump 2024 presidential election Tim Walz

During her recent interview on FOX News, Vice President Kamala Harris claimed former President Donald Trump has suggested he would turn the United States military on Americans who he’s referred to as an “enemy from within.” “He has repeated it many times. You and I both know that he has talked about turning the American military on the American people,” Harris told Fox News interviewer Bret Baier. Harris and her Far Left Democrat allies have tried to make Trump out to be some kind of would-be dictator by denying there is a domestic security threat, while at the same time speculating about who or what groups among their allies Trump might target. Please allow us to clear up any confusion about who or what constitutes one of the most dangerous elements of the enemy within and offer some evidence to demonstrate the threat they represent. Regular readers of CHQ will recognize the concept of the “ Red-Green Axis ” as the alliance between anti-American Marxists and Islamists, those who wish to impose Muslim Sharia law on the entire world. Under Biden and Harris those allied anti-American interests have deeply penetrated the government of the United States, achieving unrivaled influence and power at the State Department, Pentagon and White House. For evidence one need look no further than the recent leak of highly classified documents related to Israel’s planned retaliatory attack on Iran that were apparently shared with, and then leaked by Harris-Biden administration officials. A Telegram channel by the name "Middle East Spectator" claimed on Friday that it had received documents from a source in the U.S. intelligence community about Israel's preparations for an attack on Iran. The Telegram channel routinely publishes pro-Iranian content, and the profile of the X account affiliated with the channel says it is located in Iran. Axios reported the documents include an alleged Visual Intelligence report by the Department of Defense National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) distributed inside the U.S. intelligence community earlier this week. This very close and detailed surveillance by U.S. intelligence of Israel's preparations for an attack on Iran, including the use of satellites to spy on operations carried out at Israeli Air Force bases could be of immense benefit to Iran in defending against or disrupting an Israeli attack on our mutual enemy. How could this happen? Pretty easily, given the deep penetration of the Biden-Harris administration, by our Red-Green Axis enemies. As our friend John D. Guandolo documented in his must-read report The Hamas-Muslim Brotherhood Network in the United States   this war isn’t something that is happening “over there,” the Islamists are here in the United States prepared to bring jihadi terrorism and death to our towns and cities and their plans have progressed further than our federal government is willing to admit. Here’s a short list of key jihadi operatives who have gotten “inside the wire” identified in Mr. Guandolo’s report:   Maher Bitar  - Senior Director for Intelligence Programs on the Biden National Security Council (NSC) who also served on President Obama’s NSC as Director for Israeli and Palestinian Affairs. He is a Palestinian who was an official with UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) during the time it directly funded and materially supported the designated terrorist group Hamas.   Ariane Tabatabai  - former Chief of Staff for ASD-SOLIC (Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict). Official Department of Defense policy defines the role of ASD-SOLIC as follows: “ASD(SO/LIC) oversees and advocates for Special Operations and Irregular Warfare throughout the Department of Defense to ensure these capabilities are resourced, ready, and properly employed in accordance with the National Defense Strategy.” In fact, Ariane Tabatabai is an agent of Iran who reported directly to an IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) Commander. Muzammil Siddiqi  - arguably the most prolific Hamas/MB leader in North America. Siddiqi met with President Bush shortly after 9/11/01, works with several Members of Congress, works with law enforcement agencies, works closely with the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Interfaith Outreach” efforts in the U.S., works within the Department of Defense, and is often the front man after terrorists strike in America to persuade the public to exclude Islam as the cause of any terrorism. Mohamed Magid  - One of nine Commissioners on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom appointed by President Joe Biden. Magid was the Vice President and President of ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) for over a decade and is a key leader in the U.S. Islamic Movement. ISNA is identified by the Department of Justice as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood organization which directly funds Hamas leaders and organizations. Nihad Awad  - the current leader of Hamas (doing business as CAIR - Council on American Islamic Relations). Awad - true name NIHAD HAMAD - works with U.S. security agencies including DHS and FBI, and frequently works inside the U.S. Capitol. Awad has been given significant access to the Biden White House. Despite his open support for the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Awad is still quietly working with leaders inside the U.S. government despite his public rebuke. Farooq Mitha  - “Islamic Advisor” for Hillary Clinton and Joseph Biden during their Presidential campaigns, and currently serves in the Biden administration as the Director of the Department of Defense (DoD) Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP). Mitha is a board member for the U.S. Hamas group Emgage .   Huma Abedin  – Who is now apparently engaged to Alex Soros, one of the leading funders of Leftist causes in the United States, making her a one person nexus of the Red-Green Axis. Abedin’s family, including her brother, father and mother, is deeply involved in Muslim Brotherhood organizations, including affiliations with Al Qaeda financier Abdullah Omar Naseef. Abedin’s mother, Saleha Abedin, is a board member of Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief, a part of the designated terrorist organization Union for Good founded by Hamas/MB global legal scholar Yusuf Qaradawi (deceased).   Kifah Mustapha  - senior U.S. Hamas leader operating in the Chicago, Illinois area. Mustapha is identified by the Department of Justice as a member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, which is Hamas in the United States. Mustapha participated in the FBI’s Citizen’s Academy in the Chicago area and was given access and tours of FBI Headquarters, FBI Quantico facilities, and the NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center). Government officials inside the NCTC told the media their systems had to be “unplugged” to allow Mustapha into the NCTC because he is on terrorist watchlists. The FBI defended Mustapha as being “an important member of the Palestinian community in Chicago.”   When George W. Bush spoke at the Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. on 9/17/2001 – 6 days after 9/11 - he had U.S. Hamas leader Nihad Awad  on one side of him, and the Deputy for Al Qaeda financier Alamoudi - Khalid Saffuri - on the other side.   Dar al Hijra Islamic Center - one of the leading mosques in Northern Virginia. Dar al Hijra was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas. Specifically, the “godfather” of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood - Jamal Barzinji  - signed the deed. The leadership ranks of Dar al Hijra over the years is a who’s who in the terrorist realm, and include members of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorist groups. Dar al Hijra Imams, Presidents, Youth leaders, fundraisers and others are among those who are/were Al Qaeda and Hamas leaders/members. Prior to becoming the current FBI Deputy Director, Paul Abbate spoke at the Dar al Hijra praising it and stating the FBI needed to recruit agents out of Dar al Hijra. This is similar to comments about Dar al Hijra from former FBI Director Robert Mueller III. See a video capturing this information at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHwGE4AmhJ8 .   The Department of Homeland Security’s “Countering Violent Extremism Working Group” has at least 4 Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood operatives involved as members or “Subject Matter Experts” including, but not limited to: Mohamed Elibiary , Mohamed Magid , Dalia Mogahed, and Arif Alikhan .   White House logs reveal senior Hamas/MB leaders were in the White House dozens of times during the Obama administration. These Hamas/MB leaders include, but are not limited to: Muzammil Siddiqi, Louay Safi, Esam Omeish, Salam al Marayati, Hussam Ayloush , and Alejandro Butel.   The “White House dinner celebrating Ramadan” has included Muslim Brotherhood operatives: Yahya Hendi, Ingrid Mattson, Jihad Saleh Williams, Eboo Patel, Dalia Mogahed, Farhana Khera , and other jihadis.   These jihadi efforts have two primary objectives: (1) gather intelligence, and (2) influence the leaders and power mechanisms inside the government structure to create policies and policing and war-fighting strategies and move public opinion in their favor. We don’t allege that any of the individuals named above leaked the intelligence on Israel, but how many others in the Biden-Harris administration are there who share their Islamist views and might have been in a position to do so? President Trump was right about the enemy within and one particularly dangerous element of it is the Red-Green Axis. To educate yourself about that enemy we urge CHQ readers and friends to download The Hamas-Muslim Brotherhood Network in the United States , read it and share it with your local law enforcement and legislators to educate them and raise their awareness on their crucial role in defeating “Civilization Jihad” in your community. George Rasley is editor of Richard Viguerie's ConservativeHQ.com . A veteran of over 300 political campaigns, including every Republican presidential campaign from 1976 to 2004, he served as a staff member or advance representative for some of America’s most recognized conservative political figures, including Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin and Jack Kemp. A member of American MENSA, he served on the House and Senate staff and on the staff of Vice President Dan Quayle. Rasley is a graduate of Hanover College and studied international affairs at Oxford University's Worcester College. Rasley has lived, worked and travelled extensively in the Muslim world, including staffing Vice President Quayle on official trips to Saudi Arabia and Indonesia. 2024 Election Kamala Harris campaign Red Green Axis Israel Hamas Jihad Kamala Harris Brett Baier interview October surprise Donald Trump campaign wrong track polls illegal immigration U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 transgender surgeries

Did the United States join in with the other world leaders to build a safe and altruistic organization? Only if your definition of safe and altruistic is akin to believing your mother is the tooth fairy. Nope! The instigators of, first, the League of Nations and then the United Nations had no room for charitable instruments; the plan was to set up a governance system that would eventually be used to take control of the entire world. Alger Hiss, a known Russian spy, had been Director of the Carnegie Foundation and then right-hand man for Franklin Delano Roosevelt, orchestrated the writing of the U.N. Charter.  It was built by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (in concert with Hiss) and funded by the Rockefellers (and other globalists) to control the world – courts, weapons, economy, and even our minds. And it usurps our sovereignty. With those travesties born at the Bretton Woods Conference in 1945, the CFR also gave us the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The IMF was set up to “control international exchange rates and to stabilize currencies. President Franklin D. Roosevelt took us off the gold standard so a world currency could be established. Nixon signed an executive order declaring that the U.S. would redeem its paper dollars for gold – and the IMF would serve as the world’s central bank. I ask again, why is the U.S. in the U.N? “ The Council on Foreign Relations, established years after the Federal Reserve was created, worked to promote an internationalist agenda on behalf of the international banking elite. Where the Fed took control of money and debt, the CFR took control of the ideological foundations of such an empire — encompassing the corporate, banking, political, foreign policy, military, media, and academic elite of the nation into a generally cohesive overall world view .” Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope. What’s happening? “ In 1957, a congressional investigative committee revealed the following finding: In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisers to government and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote. ‘internationalism’ in a particular sense — a form directed towards ‘world government” and a derogation of “American nationalism’. The CFR has become, in essence, an agency of the United States government. [and its productions are not objective but are directed overwhelmingly at promoting the globalist concept .” 1 Why should the U.S. be out of the U.N? Sponsored by the CFR, Count Richard Nicholas von Coudenhove-Kalergi, considered the “father of the European Union”, argued for the dissolution of national borders and the promotion of mass allogenic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. 2 He also called for the “elimination of the Caucasian race for the sake of a superstate”. 3 In rebuttal, Senator Pat McCarran on immigration legislation he co-authored: “ I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization, and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated, or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. … However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life but which, on the contrary, are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission, and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. … I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation. ” I could go on and on. I slid over the brainwashing/dumbing-down/corruption of our children in the schools through the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), a vile part of the U.N. set up to make youth into brain-dead, useful idiots. You can read more in my Cancel Culture articles and so many good books written in the past 10-20 years exposing the lies and schemes of the United Nations anti-American, anti-Western Culture schemes. As Tom DeWeese recently wrote: “The UN was wrong from its very beginning and wrong now because it has always sought to interfere with national sovereignty rather than to provide a unique forum to help keep the peace”. My question is now: Why aren’t we doing everything we can to get the U.S. out of the U.N? That will solve most of the civilized world’s problems. It’s time to slay the dragon. Author Kathleen Marquardt  has been an advocate for property rights and freedom for decades. Today, she serves as Vice President of American Policy Center. To learn more about American Policy Center and its work, including its Freedom Pod program go to www.americanpolicy.org   Sources: 1.      Hearings before the Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations, House of Representatives, 83rd Congress., Second session on HP. Res. 217, Part 1, pages 1 to 943. 2.      Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Ein Leben fur Paneuropa pp. 28-32. 3. Browne and Williams, The Killing of Uncle Sam, p.310 2024 Election 2024 Election UN Day Exit United Nations Day US membership in UN UN Summit of the Future Climate Change Sustainable global order UN agendas Global Digital Compact Agenda 21 Agenda 2030 Congressman Ron Paul American Policy Center