Transcript of Securing America with host Frank Gaffney and CHQ Editor George Rasley:
Mr. Gaffney: And George, I just want you to sort of, if you could, summarize the extent to which what I think we are increasingly inclined to call Sharia supremacism is likely to have an outsized role in shaping Democratic majorities in the House and Senate's policies.
And the President will have a role in blocking some of them, I'm sure. But talk us through the extent to which you really regard this as a very dangerous new world in Washington, DC.
George Rasley: Well, I mean, I hope that your viewers recognize the ground shifting beneath their feet with regard to the acceptance of Sharia supremacism within the Democratic Party.
And you can go through and find, in the face of what we know is Sharia's oppression of women, leaders and female leaders in the Democratic Party cos-playing as Muslims wearing their hijabs and supporting things like wear a hijab to school day and stuff like that.
So, the Overton window, if you will, is moving in the direction of accepting Sharia as a civilization alternative.
It's clearly a threat to American constitutional liberty.
In fact, it's almost the exact opposite.
But yet it's treated by Democrats as something that's perfectly normal.
Mr. Gaffney: And, uh, now, can I ask you on that point? What, what about this concern has now been expressed by colleagues of ours at the, uh, Center for Renewing America, a very, I think, esteemed organization in Washington, DC, founded by the man who's now our OMB Director, the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vougt, that, that if you have these views, that, Sharia is your overarching objective, insinuating it into our country and ultimately having it replace our Constitution.
Or for that matter, you're a Marxist who has a sort of similar end state in mind, not necessarily Sharia, but getting rid of the constitution and the country, that you can't take the oath of office.
And what should that mean in practice with respect to some of these candidates, sir?
George Rasley: Clearly a Republican should raise an objection to the seating of these guys, that their oath of office was not taken without reservation or purpose of evasion.
And yet, but this has been a problem within the Democratic Party for a long time. I mean, we've had people on the Intelligence Committee and the Armed Services Committee who were clearly on the other side.
I mean, Karen Bass went to Cuba [when she was in Congress].
Andre Carson, senior member of the intelligence committee, Muslim Brotherhood guy.
And so on and so forth. So, this is not a new problem, but it is one that's increasingly problematic because we have not only now the Marxists, but the Sharia supremacists to worry about.
And I would hope that some brave Republican would raise an objection to their seating. But I'm skeptical that that's going to happen, but I'll throw it out there for anybody that's watching.
